git.net

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Proposal: Let's drop i386


Hello,

On 05/09/2018 07:03 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> I have never seen yours or Olivers name recently fixing i386 and autopkg test
> failures.  Should be easily to do for you, it's free, and there's no work involved.

I would agree with this point; although I rarely have had to fix
i386-only issues, they come up now and then. With our Proposed
Migration[1] infrastructure, it is extra work to maintain *any*
additional architecture.

"Free from Debian" isn't necessarily an excuse either. Often times,
issues that we need to fix are Ubuntu-specific. With the Debian Release
Team starting to embrace autopkgtesting for testing migration, this
improves things, but not completely.

By that same logic, where's our RISC V port? What about SPARC64? The
answer I have consistently gotten (and agree with, for that matter) is
that it takes time, money, and infrastructure to maintain these ports.
Certainly, if there is good cause to remove a port from the archive
without causing many issues, saving developer time is preferred.

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ProposedMigration

-- 
Simon Quigley
tsimonq2 at ubuntu.com
tsimonq2 on freenode and OFTC
5C7A BEA2 0F86 3045 9CC8
C8B5 E27F 2CF8 458C 2FA4

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-discuss/attachments/20180509/3067946a/attachment.sig>