git.net

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]# I'm wrong or Will we fix the ducks limp?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Op 09-06-16 om 13:46 schreef Julien Salort: > Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon at rece.vub.ac.be> wrote: > >> A.x = 1; >> A.y = 2; >> >> B = A; >> >> B.x = 3; >> B.y = 4; >> >> >> In C the variable A will still be x:1, y:2. >> In Python the variable A will be x:3, y:4. > But it would, if you had written instead: > > A->x = 1; > A->y = 2; > > B = A; > > B->x = 3; > B->y = 4; > > which backs indeed the C pointer analogy... Yes, what is your point? I know there is a C pointer analogy with Python variables. The fact that there is an analogy between C pointers and Python variables, is not enough to conclude that C variables and Python variables behave exactly the same. Normal structs are a kind of variable too in C. If you have to ignore those in order to show similarities, then the variables in general don't behave exactly the same.

- Prev by Date:
**Tie dictionary to database table?** - Next by Date:
**google sheet and google app engine(GAE) python** - Previous by thread:
**I'm wrong or Will we fix the ducks limp?** - Next by thread:
**I'm wrong or Will we fix the ducks limp?** - Index(es):