I'm wrong or Will we fix the ducks limp?
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> Even if you were right that objects must exist at
> a single well-defined location, that is strictly irrelevant. That's
> implementation, not interface.
We're talking about mental models. Sure, you could come up
with some kind of Tardis-like mental model where objects
exist in more than one location at once. But why would
you bother going to such mental contortions? There is a much
more straightforward model that's vastly easier to reason
about, because it aligns with our intuitions, which are
based on the way things behave in the actual universe we