[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[cinder] need comments TODAY about DB handling for default_types

There's a discussion going on about , namely about how to handle 
the new default_types table.  My view is that since it simply records a 
relation between a project and a volume_type, it's not the kind of thing 
that we need to keep a history of, and entries could be hard-deleted. 
The current patch keeps a history by introducing an additional is_active 
column.  The additional complexity is worth it if we want to keep a 
history of this relation, but is not if we don't.

Please leave your thoughts on the patch as soon as possible (i.e., in 
the next few hours) so Rajat can complete this feature.