git.net

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[oslo][release][requirement] FFE request for Oslo lib



On 9/11/20 8:08 AM, Ghanshyam Mann wrote:
>   ---- On Wed, 09 Sep 2020 22:22:13 -0500 Ghanshyam Mann <gmann at ghanshyammann.com> wrote ----
>   >  ---- On Wed, 09 Sep 2020 14:54:05 -0500 Ghanshyam Mann <gmann at ghanshyammann.com> wrote ----
>   >  >
>   >  >  ---- On Wed, 09 Sep 2020 14:25:43 -0500 Matthew Thode <mthode at mthode.org> wrote ----
>   >  >  > On 20-09-09 12:04:51, Ben Nemec wrote:
>   >  >  > >
>   >  >  > > On 9/8/20 10:45 AM, Ghanshyam Mann wrote:
>   >  >  > > > Hello Team,
>   >  >  > > >
>   >  >  > > > This is regarding FFE for Focal migration work. As planned, we have to move the Victoria testing to Focal and
>   >  >  > > > base job switch is planned to be switched by today[1].
>   >  >  > > >
>   >  >  > > > There are few oslo lib need work (especially tox job-based testing not user-facing changes) to pass on Focal
>   >  >  > > > - https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:migrate-to-focal-oslo+(status:open+OR+status:merged)
>   >  >  > > >
>   >  >  > > > If we move the base tox jobs to Focal then these lib victoria gates (especially lower-constraint job) will be failing.
>   >  >  > > > We can either do these as FFE or backport (as this is lib own CI fixes only) later once the victoria branch is open.
>   >  >  > > > Opinion?
>   >  >  > >
>   >  >  > > As I noted in the meeting, if we have to do this to keep the gates working
>   >  >  > > then I'd rather do it as an FFE than have to backport all of the relevant
>   >  >  > > patches. IMHO we should only decline this FFE if we are going to also change
>   >  >  > > our statement of support for Python/Ubuntu in Victoria.
>   >  >  > >
>   >  >  > > >
>   >  >  > > > [1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-September/017060.html
>   >  >  > > >
>   >  >  > > > -gmann
>   >  >  > > >
>   >  >  > > >
>   >  >  > >
>   >  >  >
>   >  >  > https://review.opendev.org/#/c/750089 seems like the only functional
>   >  >  > change.  It has my ACK with my requirements hat on.
>   >
>   > NOTE: There is one py3.8 bug fix also merged in oslo.uitls which is not yet released. This made py3.8 job voting in oslo.utils gate.
>   > - https://review.opendev.org/#/c/750216/
>   >
>   > Rest all l-c bump are now passing on Focal
>   > - https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:migrate-to-focal-oslo+(status:open+OR+status:merged)
> 
> All the patches are merged now, requesting to reconsider this FEE so that we can avoid more delay in this.

The final Oslo releases with the focal changes are merged. We should be 
able to branch now and if anything else comes up we'll just have to 
backport.

Thanks to everyone for working with us to get this sorted out, and sorry 
I dropped the ball on this goal.