git.net

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[oslo][kolla][requirements][release][infra] Hit by an old, fixed bug


Thanks, Ben. That doc preamble really made me think not to cross the
holy ground of release proposals. :-)

I proposed release [1] and added you and Hervé as reviewers.

[1] https://review.opendev.org/701080

-yoctozepto

czw., 2 sty 2020 o 21:20 Ben Nemec <openstack at nemebean.com> napisaÅ?(a):
>
>
>
> On 12/30/19 9:52 AM, RadosÅ?aw Piliszek wrote:
> > Thanks, Sean! I knew I was missing something really basic!
> > I was under the impression that 9.x is Stein, like it happens with
> > main projects (major=branch).
> > I could not find any doc explaining oslo.messaging versioning, perhaps
> > Oslo could release 9.5.1 off the stein branch?
>
> Oslo for the most part follows semver, so we only bump major versions
> when there is a breaking change. We bump minor versions each release so
> we can do bugfix releases on the previous stable branch without stepping
> on master releases.
>
> The underlying cause of this is likely that I'm way behind on releasing
> the Oslo stable branches. It's high on my todo list now that most people
> are back from holidays and will be around to help out if a release
> breaks something.
>
> However, anyone can propose a release[0][1] (contrary to what [0]
> suggests), so if the necessary fix is already on stable/stein and just
> hasn't been released yet please feel free to do that. You'll just need a
> +1 from either myself or hberaud (the Oslo release liaison) before the
> release team will approve it.
>
> 0: https://releases.openstack.org/reference/using.html#requesting-a-release
> 1:
> https://releases.openstack.org/reference/using.html#using-new-release-command
>
> >
> > The issue remains that, even though oslo backports bugfixes into their
> > stable branches, kolla (and very possibly other deployment solutions)
> > no longer benefit from them.
> >
> > -yoctozepto
> >
> > pon., 30 gru 2019 o 16:01 Sean McGinnis <sean.mcginnis at gmx.com> napisaÅ?(a):
> >>
> >> On Sun, Dec 29, 2019 at 09:41:45PM +0100, RadosÅ?aw Piliszek wrote:
> >>> Hi Folks,
> >>>
> >>> as the subject goes, my installation has been hit by an old bug:
> >>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/oslo.messaging/+bug/1828841
> >>> (bug details not important, linked here for background)
> >>>
> >>> I am using Stein, deployed with recent Kolla-built source-based images
> >>> (with only slight modifications compared to vanilla ones).
> >>> Kolla's procedure for building source-based images considers upper
> >>> constraints, which, unfortunately, turned out to be lagging behind a
> >>> few releases w.r.t. oslo.messaging at least.
> >>> The fix was in 9.7.0 released on May 21, u-c still point to 9.5.0 from
> >>> Feb 26 and the latest of Stein is 9.8.0 from Jul 18.
> >>>
> >>> It seems oslo.messaging is missing from the automatic updates that bot proposes:
> >>> https://review.opendev.org/#/q/owner:%22OpenStack+Proposal+Bot%22+project:openstack/requirements+branch:stable/stein
> >>>
> >>> Per:
> >>> https://opendev.org/openstack/releases/src/branch/master/doc/source/reference/reviewer_guide.rst#release-jobs
> >>> this upper-constraint proposal should be happening for all releases.
> >>>
> >>
> >> This is normal and what is expected.
> >>
> >> Requirements are only updated for the branch in which those releases happen. So
> >> if there is a release of oslo.messaging for stable/train, only the stable/train
> >> upper constraints are updated for that new release. The stable/stein branch
> >> will not be affected because that shows what the tested upper constraints were
> >> for that branch.
> >>
> >> The last stable/stein release for oslo.messaging was 9.5.0:
> >>
> >> https://opendev.org/openstack/releases/src/branch/master/deliverables/stein/oslo.messaging.yaml#L49
> >>
> >> And 9.5.0 is what is set in the stable/stein upper-constraints:
> >>
> >> https://opendev.org/openstack/requirements/src/branch/stable/stein/upper-constraints.txt#L146
> >>
> >> To get that raised, whatever necessary bugfixes that are required in
> >> oslo.messaging would need to be backported per-cycle until stable/stein (as in,
> >> if it was in current master, it would need to be backported and merged to
> >> stable/train first, then stable/stein), and once merged a stable release would
> >> need to be proposed for that branch's version of the library.
> >>
> >> Once that stable release is done, that will propose the update to the upper
> >> constraint for the given branch.
> >>
> >>> I would be glad if someone investigated why it happens(/ed) and
> >>> audited whether other OpenStack projects don't need updating as well
> >>> to avoid running on old deps when new are awaiting for months. :-)
> >>> Please note this might apply to other branches as well.
> >>>
> >>> PS: for some reason oslo.messaging Stein release notes (
> >>> https://docs.openstack.org/releasenotes/oslo.messaging/stein.html )
> >>> are stuck at 9.5.0 as well, this could be right (I did not inspect the
> >>> sources) but I am adding this in PS so you have more things to
> >>> correlate if they need be.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Again, as expected. The last stable/stein release was 9.5.0, so that is correct
> >> that the release notes for stein only show up to that point.
> >