[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[uc][tc][ops] reviving osops- repos

On 11/06/2019 13.55,  Jean-Philippe Evrard  wrote:
>> Alternatively, I feel like a SIG (be it the Ops Docs SIG or a new 
>> "Operational tooling" SIG) would totally be a good idea to revive this. 
>> In that case we'd define the repository in [4].
>> My personal preference would be for a new SIG, but whoever is signing up 
>> to work on this should definitely have the final say.
> Agreed on having it inside OpenStack namespace, and code handled by a team/SIG/WG (with my preference being a SIG -- existing or not). When this team/SIG/WG retires, the repo would with it. It provides clean ownership, and clear cleanup when disbanding.

Mohammed, is that consensus and actionable?

Could you then update to reflect
this, please?

 Andreas Jaeger aj at Twitter: jaegerandi
  SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, D 90409 Nürnberg
   GF: Felix Imendörffer, Mary Higgins, Sri Rasiah,
       HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
    GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126