[uc][tc][ops] reviving osops- repos
On 11/06/2019 13.55, Jean-Philippe Evrard wrote:
>> Alternatively, I feel like a SIG (be it the Ops Docs SIG or a new
>> "Operational tooling" SIG) would totally be a good idea to revive this.
>> In that case we'd define the repository in .
>> My personal preference would be for a new SIG, but whoever is signing up
>> to work on this should definitely have the final say.
> Agreed on having it inside OpenStack namespace, and code handled by a team/SIG/WG (with my preference being a SIG -- existing or not). When this team/SIG/WG retires, the repo would with it. It provides clean ownership, and clear cleanup when disbanding.
Mohammed, is that consensus and actionable?
Could you then update https://review.opendev.org/#/c/662300/ to reflect
Andreas Jaeger aj at suse.com Twitter: jaegerandi
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, D 90409 NÃ¼rnberg
GF: Felix ImendÃ¶rffer, Mary Higgins, Sri Rasiah,
HRB 21284 (AG NÃ¼rnberg)
GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126