> On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 6:51 PM, Alexandre Julliard <[email protected]>
>> Bruno Jesus <[email protected]> writes:
>>> On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 6:14 PM, Alexandre Julliard <[email protected]>
>>>> André Hentschel <[email protected]> writes:
>>>>> Signed-off-by: André Hentschel <[email protected]>
>>>>> dlls/iphlpapi/iphlpapi_main.c | 2 +-
>>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>> This doesn't look to me like an improvement.
>>> It is an improvement because a same name variable is declared inside a
>>> for  lines below this one. So reducing the scope will make the
>>> variables no longer overlap.
>> It's a different scope, they already don't overlap. It's done the same
>> way as the v4 case above it.
> You are right, they are not in the same scope. Yet it is not exactly
> like ipv4 case. Line 1116 declares the prefix and line 1122 the sa,
> while in the ipv6 case both variables are declared in 1078. The change
> makes the code look more similar by declaring the ipv6 sa inside the
> for just like the ipv4.
The ipv6 code starting at line 1078 is a copy of the ipv4 code starting
at line 1047. In both cases the variable is in the larger scope, which
works just as well.