Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Packages: Again



On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 03:08:58PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 08:56:23PM +0100, Fabien COELHO wrote:
> >
> > >I think we need to focus on things that _can't_ be done first, rather
> > >than things that require porting, e.g. until we had savepoints, you
> > >couldn't migrate an application that needed it. It wasn't a question of
> > >porting --- there was just no way to port it.
> > >
> > >Those _missing_ pieces should be a priority.
> >
> > Nested/autonomous transactions? Do they occur often in PL/SQL code?
>
> Yes, they do based on the number of "I can't port from Oracle"
> complaints we used to get, perhaps related to exceptions. Once we had
> them, the complaints of that type disappeared.

Oh, I was talking about savepoints/nested-transactions, not autonomous
transactions.

--
Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +


--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers



Programming list archiving by: Enterprise Git Hosting