Subject: Re: Is "-init" really needed?

On 8 Aug 2017, at 17:38, Doug Hill <[email protected]> wrote:
> As others have mentioned, I too have never seen any evidence or statements
> from Apple that discourages +new or -init.

I suspect it was ObjC programmers themselves rather than Apple/NeXT that
discouraged it. As for why, well I can imagine a few reasons:

- Performance - it incurs an extra message send (which would have been an issue
back in the day)

- Clarity - [[… alloc] init] shows clearly that it’s a two step operation (some
classes support being *re*-initialized, so you can call initialisers more than
once; other classes don’t actually need initialising)

- If +new was the way to go, you’d need variants of +new for each variant of
-init (or you have to use [[… alloc] init] anyway)

- The fact that convenience constructors were often written naming the object,
e.g. [NSString stringWithFormat:…], [NSArray array]. +new would duplicate
that, but isn’t as nice to read or look at. OK, +new doesn’t autorelease, but

Kind regards,




Cocoa-dev mailing list ([email protected])

Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)

Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to [email protected]

Programming list archiving by: Enterprise Git Hosting