Subject: Re: [CentOS] Errors on an SSD drive

On Aug 10, 2017, at 2:07 AM, John Hodrien <[email protected]> wrote:
> For a well configured desktop that rarely needs to swap, I struggle to see the
> load on the SSD as being significant, and yet obviously the performance of an
> SSD would make it ideal for swap.

I agree.

It’s a bad idea to do without swap even if you almost never use it, because
today’s bloated apps often have many pages of virtual memory they rarely or
never actually touch. You want those pages to get swapped out quickly so that
the precious RAM can be used more productively; by the buffer cache, if nothing

I once used a web application server on a headless VPS that still had GUI
libraries linked to its binary because one of the underlying technologies it
uses was also used in a GUI app, and it was too difficult to tear all that GUI
code out, even if it was never called. Because the VPS technology didn’t
support swap, I directly paid the price for those megs of unused (and
unusable!) libraries in my monthly VPS rental fees.

> Coo, I've never seen a disk actually shrink due to failed sectors. I don't
> think I've got an SSD into a worn state yet to see this.

Me, neither. I’m pretty sure the spare sector pool’s size isn’t reported to
the OS, and the drive isn’t allowed to dip into the sectors it does expose
externally for spares.

When the spare pool is used up, the drive just starts failing in a way that
even SMART can see.
CentOS mailing list
[email protected]

Programming list archiving by: Enterprise Git Hosting