git.net

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

re: AW: AW: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36


No, I don't know and won't be able to check before tomorrow evening.

 

I would say that these tests were passing with 2.4.x when it was added (~3 weeks ago), so it could be a regression.

But it needs to be checked to be sure about it.

 

Nothing obvious in the recent commits look related to a change of behavior in this area.

 

CJ

 

> Message du 11/10/18 13:15
> De : "Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group" <ruediger.pluem@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> A : "dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Copie à :
> Objet : AW: AW: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36
>
>

Do you know if the failure is a regression over 2.4.35?

 

Regards

 

Rüdiger

 

Von: Marion et Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 11. Oktober 2018 13:13
> An: dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Betreff: re: AW: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36

 

> Waouh!

>  

> This would mean I've provided a new useful test!

> (it has been added recently in r1841508)

>  

> :)

>  

> I definitely need to document how to generate and use test-coverage data when running the test framework.

> This helps to spot where new tests are needed.

>  

> CJ

>  

>  

>  

> Message du 11/10/18 10:08
> > De : "Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group" <ruediger.pluem@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > A : "dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Copie à :
> > Objet : AW: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36
> >
> > Anyone else seeing
> >
> > t/modules/buffer.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 12 Failed: 2)
> > Failed tests: 8, 12
> >
> > ?
> >
> > I don't see this with trunk on the same machine. Issue seems to be if input filtering is on on large POSTs.
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Rüdiger
> >
> > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > > Von: Daniel Ruggeri <druggeri@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 11. Oktober 2018 02:27
> > > An: dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36
> > >
> > > +1 from me (talking to myself).
> > >
> > > Test environment follows. I observe only one failure of the test suite
> > > (mentioned elsewhere) - it seems only to apply w/ OpenSSL 1.1.1 and H2.
> > >
> > > system:
> > >   kernel:
> > >     name: Linux
> > >     release: 3.16.0-4-amd64
> > >     version: #1 SMP Debian 3.16.51-3 (2017-12-13)
> > >     machine: x86_64
> > >
> > >   libraries:
> > >     openssl: "1.1.1"
> > >     openldap: "2.4.46"
> > >     apr: "1.6.5"
> > >     apr-util: "1.6.1"
> > >     iconv: "1.2.2"
> > >     brotli: "1.0.6"
> > >     nghttp2: "1.34.0"
> > >     zlib: "1.2.11"
> > >     pcre: "8.42"
> > >     libxml2: "2.9.8"
> > >     php: "5.6.38"
> > >     lua: "5.3.5"
> > >     curl: "7.61.1"
> > >
> > > --
> > > Daniel Ruggeri
> > >
> > > On 10/10/2018 2:18 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
> > > > Hi, all;
> > > >    Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
> > > >
> > > > I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this
> > > > candidate tarball as 2.4.36:
> > > > [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
> > > > [ ] +0: Let's have a talk.
> > > > [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong.
> > > >
> > > > The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are:
> > > > sha1: e40e7a879b84df860215b8a80f2a535534a1c4b4 *httpd-2.4.36.tar.gz
> > > > sha256:
> > > > ef788fb7c814acb2506a8b758a1a3f91f368f97bd4e6db16e98001f468e8e288
> > > > *httpd-2.4.36.tar.gz
> > > >
> >
> >