Re: mod_proxy_uwsgi build errors
> On Dec 15, 2017, at 7:06 AM, Jim Jagielski <jim@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Dec 13, 2017, at 2:49 PM, Ruediger Pluem <rpluem@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 12/13/2017 04:27 PM, Steffen wrote:
>>> I know, for example:
>> At least this one includes inttypes.h which seems according to the comments is only available on C99.
>> Should we create an apr_uint8_t in apr and / or simply use apr_uint16_t in the uint8_t cases?
> I think we should create an ap_uint8_t while we wait for APR to
> create an apr_uint8_t
APR *does* have apr_byte_t, which some modules (like mod_proxy_ajp)
use as a substitute for uint8_t
Anyway, we have numerous places where we are using the uint*_t
family. I've cleaned up the ones that affect backports and have updated
STATUS as required.