Re: A proposal...
> On Apr 25, 2018, at 1:50 PM, William A Rowe Jr <wrowe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Because of our conflation of patch and enhancement,
It is hardly just "our"... tons and tons of s/w uses the patch number bump for not only patches but also features and enhancements, including our "competitors".
I still fail to see anything which leads me to believe that our numbering is the core issue that must be fixed. I am extremely open to my mind being changed :)