git.net

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [DISCUSS] Renumber Groovy 2.6 to 2.9


What about 2.97 ? Incorporates a JDK 7 reference, and is not too close to 3.0 (Bugfixes could go into 2.97.1 etc..., so the "7" could be kept).

-------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --------
Von: Russel Winder <russel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Datum: 20.05.18 12:26 (GMT+01:00)
An: paulk@xxxxxxxxxxxx, dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] Renumber Groovy 2.6 to 2.9

On Sun, 2018-05-20 at 13:58 +1000, Paul King wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering what people thought about renumbering Groovy 2.6 to 2.9.
> It is only a subtle change but I think better conveys that it isn't a small
> step up
> from 2.5 but rather something just a bit short of 3.
>

If it is to be the last 2.X release why not 2.99 to make it more "in your
face"?

--
Russel.
==========================================
Dr Russel Winder      t: +44 20 7585 2200
41 Buckmaster Road    m: +44 7770 465 077
London SW11 1EN, UK   w: www.russel.org.uk