git.net

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Portable Java Contracts


FYI, I have to fixup the current PR because I goofed up, but I'm doing that now.

On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 5:00 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Raymond

Does it mean we can drop the providerlocator now?

Not with this change.
I believe you are referring to the Service Loader Mediator [1] (like Aries SpiFly [2]), which I could do as a second PR if that is really wanted.
 

+1 anyhow for the pr

Great! thx

 


Le mar. 15 mai 2018 21:52, Raymond Auge <raymond.auge@xxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
Hello All,

As some of you know several of the OSGi RIs consume the specification bundles produced by the Apache Geronimo project.

In the last couple of OSGi releases we've been applying the requirement for Portable Java Contracts as part of new and updated specs. Now as the specs of OSGi Release 7 have finalized we're in need to close out the RIs.

To that end I'd like to request the application of the Portable Java Contracts to the Geronimo spec bundles.

I've created an issue [1] and sent a PR [2] which makes the necessary changes.

Would someone be so kind as to review this?

Next, if acceptable, would someone call a release? I'm not sure of the specs can be released all at once, but that would be the best case scenario.

Sincerely,
- Ray


--
Raymond Augé (@rotty3000)
Senior Software Architect Liferay, Inc. (@Liferay)
Board Member & EEG Co-Chair, OSGi Alliance (@OSGiAlliance)



--
Raymond Augé (@rotty3000)
Senior Software Architect Liferay, Inc. (@Liferay)
Board Member & EEG Co-Chair, OSGi Alliance (@OSGiAlliance)