Re: [WEBSITE] Proposal to rework the Flink website
Yes, making sure that google search results point to the most recent doc would be very good. :+1
Also +1 to the general effort, of course.
> On 5. Jun 2018, at 20:19, Ken Krugler <kkrugler_lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Along these lines, it would help to add a sitemap (and the robots.txt required to reference it) for flink.apache.org and ci.apache.org (for /projects/flink)
> You can see what Tomcat did along these lines - http://tomcat.apache.org/robots.txt references http://tomcat.apache.org/sitemap.xml, which is a sitemap index file pointing to http://tomcat.apache.org/sitemap-main.xml
> By doing this, you can emphasize more recent versions of docs. There are other benefits, but reducing poor Google search results (to me) is the biggest win.
> E.g. https://www.google.com/search?q=flink+reducingstate <https://www.google.com/search?q=flink+reducingstate> (search on flink reducing state) shows the 1.3 Javadocs (hit #1), master (1.6-SNAPSHOT) Javadocs (hit #2), and then many pages of other results.
> Whereas the Javadocs for 1.5 <https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-release-1.5/api/java/org/apache/flink/api/common/state/ReducingState.html> and 1.4 <https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-release-1.4/api/java/org/apache/flink/api/common/state/ReducingState.html> are nowhere to be found.
> — Ken
>> On Jun 5, 2018, at 9:46 AM, Stephan Ewen <sewen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Big +1 to this!
>> I would like to contribute to this effort and help strengthen the way Flink
>> presents itself.
>> On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 11:56 AM, Fabian Hueske <fhueske@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Hi everybody,
>>> I've opened a PR  that reworks parts of the Flink website (
>>> My goal is to improve the structure of the website and provide more
>>> valuable information about the project and the community.
>>> A visitor (who doesn't know Flink yet) should be able to easily find
>>> answers to the following questions:
>>> * What is Apache Flink?
>>> * Does it address my use case?
>>> * Is it credible? / Who is using it?
>>> To achieve that, I have:
>>> * Rework menu structure into three sections to address different audiences:
>>> - Potential users (see above)
>>> - Users
>>> - Contributors
>>> * Reworked start page: updated the figure, added a feature grid, moved
>>> "Powered By" section up
>>> * Replaced Features page by more detailed "What is Flink?" pages
>>> * Reworked "Use Cases" page
>>> The PR should also improve the page for users who have questions about
>>> Flink or need help.
>>> For that, I have:
>>> * Added a "Getting Help" page (less content than the detailed community
>>> * Removed IRC channel info
>>> Please give feedback, suggest improvements, and proof read the new texts.
>>> Thanks, Fabian
>>>  https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/109
> +1 530-210-6378