git.net

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: advanced networking with public IPs direct to VMs


Rafael


Here is the output as requested -



mysql> mysql> select * from cloud.storage_pool where removed is null;
+----+------+--------------------------------------+-------------------+------+----------------+--------+------------+------------+----------------+--------------+-----------+-----------------+---------------------+---------+-------------+--------+-----------------------+-------+------------+---------+---------------+
| id | name | uuid                                 | pool_type         | port | data_center_id | pod_id | cluster_id | used_bytes | capacity_bytes | host_address | user_info | path            | created             | removed | update_time | status | storage_provider_name | scope | hypervisor | managed | capacity_iops |
+----+------+--------------------------------------+-------------------+------+----------------+--------+------------+------------+----------------+--------------+-----------+-----------------+---------------------+---------+-------------+--------+-----------------------+-------+------------+---------+---------------+
|  1 | ds1  | a234224f-05fb-3f4c-9b0f-c51ebdf9a601 | NetworkFilesystem | 2049 |              1 |   NULL |       NULL | 6059720704 |    79133933568 | 172.30.5.2   | NULL      | /export/primary | 2018-06-05 13:45:01 | NULL    | NULL        | Up     | DefaultPrimary        | ZONE  | KVM        |       0 |          NULL |
+----+------+--------------------------------------+-------------------+------+----------------+--------+------------+------------+----------------+--------------+-----------+-----------------+---------------------+---------+-------------+--------+-----------------------+-------+------------+---------+---------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)

mysql>

Do you think this problem is related to my NIC/bridge configuration or the way I am configuring the zone ?

Jon
________________________________
From: Rafael Weingärtner <rafaelweingartner@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: 07 June 2018 06:45
To: users
Subject: Re: advanced networking with public IPs direct to VMs

Can you also post the result of:
select * from cloud.storage_pool where removed is null

On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 3:06 PM, Dag Sonstebo <Dag.Sonstebo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

> Hi Jon,
>
> Still confused where your primary storage pools are – are you sure your
> hosts are in cluster 1?
>
> Quick question just to make sure - assuming management/storage is on the
> same NIC when I setup basic networking the physical network has the
> management and guest icons already there and I just edit the KVM labels. If
> I am running storage over management do I need to drag the storage icon to
> the physical network and use the same KVM label (cloudbr0) as the
> management or does CS automatically just use the management NIC ie. I would
> only need to drag the storage icon across in basic setup if I wanted it on
> a different NIC/IP subnet ?  (hope that makes sense !)
>
> >> I would do both – set up your 2/3 physical networks, name isn’t that
> important – but then drag the traffic types to the correct one and make
> sure the labels are correct.
> Regards,
> Dag Sonstebo
> Cloud Architect
> ShapeBlue
>
> On 06/06/2018, 12:39, "Jon Marshall" <jms.123@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>     Dag
>
>
>     Do you mean  check the pools with "Infrastructure -> Primary Storage"
> and "Infrastructure -> Secondary Storage" within the UI ?
>
>
>     If so Primary Storage has a state of UP, secondary storage does not
> show a state as such so not sure where else to check it ?
>
>
>     Rerun of the command -
>
>     mysql> select * from cloud.storage_pool where cluster_id = 1;
>     Empty set (0.00 sec)
>
>     mysql>
>
>     I think it is something to do with my zone creation rather than the
> NIC, bridge setup although I can post those if needed.
>
>     I may try to setup just the 2 NIC solution you mentioned although as I
> say I had the same issue with that ie. host goes to "Altert" state and same
> error messages.  The only time I can get it to go to "Down" state is when
> it is all on the single NIC.
>
>     Quick question just to make sure - assuming management/storage is on
> the same NIC when I setup basic networking the physical network has the
> management and guest icons already there and I just edit the KVM labels. If
> I am running storage over management do I need to drag the storage icon to
> the physical network and use the same KVM label (cloudbr0) as the
> management or does CS automatically just use the management NIC ie. I would
> only need to drag the storage icon across in basic setup if I wanted it on
> a different NIC/IP subnet ?  (hope that makes sense !)
>
>     On the plus side I have been at this for so long now and done so many
> rebuilds I could do it in my sleep now 😊
>
>
>     ________________________________
>     From: Dag Sonstebo <Dag.Sonstebo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>     Sent: 06 June 2018 12:28
>     To: users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>     Subject: Re: advanced networking with public IPs direct to VMs
>
>     Looks OK to me Jon.
>
>     The one thing that throws me is your storage pools – can you rerun
> your query: select * from cloud.storage_pool where cluster_id = 1;
>
>     Do the pools show up as online in the CloudStack GUI?
>
>     Regards,
>     Dag Sonstebo
>     Cloud Architect
>     ShapeBlue
>
>     On 06/06/2018, 12:08, "Jon Marshall" <jms.123@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>         Don't know whether this helps or not but I logged into the SSVM
> and ran an ifconfig -
>
>
>         eth0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST>  mtu 1500
>                 inet 169.254.3.35  netmask 255.255.0.0  broadcast
> 169.254.255.255
>                 ether 0e:00:a9:fe:03:23  txqueuelen 1000  (Ethernet)
>                 RX packets 141  bytes 20249 (19.7 KiB)
>                 RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0
>                 TX packets 108  bytes 16287 (15.9 KiB)
>                 TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0
>
>         eth1: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST>  mtu 1500
>                 inet 172.30.3.34  netmask 255.255.255.192  broadcast
> 172.30.3.63
>                 ether 1e:00:3b:00:00:05  txqueuelen 1000  (Ethernet)
>                 RX packets 56722  bytes 4953133 (4.7 MiB)
>                 RX errors 0  dropped 44573  overruns 0  frame 0
>                 TX packets 11224  bytes 1234932 (1.1 MiB)
>                 TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0
>
>         eth2: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST>  mtu 1500
>                 inet 172.30.4.86  netmask 255.255.255.128  broadcast
> 172.30.4.127
>                 ether 1e:00:d9:00:00:53  txqueuelen 1000  (Ethernet)
>                 RX packets 366191  bytes 435300557 (415.1 MiB)
>                 RX errors 0  dropped 39456  overruns 0  frame 0
>                 TX packets 145065  bytes 7978602 (7.6 MiB)
>                 TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0
>
>         eth3: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST>  mtu 1500
>                 inet 172.30.5.14  netmask 255.255.255.240  broadcast
> 172.30.5.15
>                 ether 1e:00:cb:00:00:1a  txqueuelen 1000  (Ethernet)
>                 RX packets 132440  bytes 426362982 (406.6 MiB)
>                 RX errors 0  dropped 39446  overruns 0  frame 0
>                 TX packets 67443  bytes 423670834 (404.0 MiB)
>                 TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0
>
>         lo: flags=73<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING>  mtu 65536
>                 inet 127.0.0.1  netmask 255.0.0.0
>                 loop  txqueuelen 1  (Local Loopback)
>                 RX packets 18  bytes 1440 (1.4 KiB)
>                 RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0
>                 TX packets 18  bytes 1440 (1.4 KiB)
>                 TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0
>
>
>         so it has interfaces in both the management and the storage
> subnets (as well as guest).
>
>
>
>         ________________________________
>         From: Jon Marshall <jms.123@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>         Sent: 06 June 2018 11:08
>         To: users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>         Subject: Re: advanced networking with public IPs direct to VMs
>
>         Hi Rafael
>
>
>         Thanks for the help, really appreciate it.
>
>
>         So rerunning that command with all servers up -
>
>
>
>         mysql> select * from cloud.storage_pool where cluster_id = 1 and
> removed is null;
>         Empty set (0.00 sec)
>
>         mysql>
>
>
>         As for the storage IP no I'm not setting it to be the management
> IP when I setup the zone but the output of the SQL command suggests that is
> what has happened.
>
>         As I said to Dag I am using a different subnet for storage ie.
>
>         172.30.3.0/26  - management subnet
>         172.30.4.0/25 -  guest VM subnet
>         172.30.5.0/28 - storage
>
>         the NFS server IP is 172.30.5.2
>
>         each compute node has 3 NICs with an IP from each subnet (i am
> assuming the management node only needs an IP in the management network ?)
>
>         When I add the zone in the UI I have one physical network with
> management (cloudbr0), guest (cloudbr1) and storage (cloudbr2).
>         When I fill in the storage traffic page I use the range
> 172.16.5.10 - 14 as free IPs as I exclude the ones already allocated to the
> compute nodes and the NFS server.
>
>         I think maybe I am doing something wrong in the UI setup but it is
> not obvious to me what it is.
>
>         What I might try today unless you want me to keep the setup I have
> for more outputs is to go back to 2 NICs, one for storage/management and
> one for guest VMs.
>
>         I think with the 2 NICs setup the mistake I made last time when
> adding the zone was to assume storage would just run over management so I
> did not drag and drop the storage icon and assign it to cloudbr0 as with
> the management which I think is what I should do ?
>
>
>
>
>
>         ________________________________
>         From: Rafael Weingärtner <rafaelweingartner@xxxxxxxxx>
>         Sent: 06 June 2018 10:54
>         To: users
>         Subject: Re: advanced networking with public IPs direct to VMs
>
>         Jon, do not panic we are here to help you :)
>         So, I might have mistyped the SQL query. You you use select * from
>         cloud.storage_pool where cluster_id = 1 and removed is not null ",
> you are
>         listing the storage pools removed. Therefore, the right query
> would be "
>         select * from cloud.storage_pool where cluster_id = 1 and removed
> is null "
>
>         There is also something else I do not understand. You are setting
> the
>         storage IP in the management subnet? I am not sure if you should
> be doing
>         like this. Normally, I set all my storages (primary[when working
> with NFS]
>         and secondary) to IPs in the storage subnet.
>
>         On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 6:49 AM, Dag Sonstebo <
> Dag.Sonstebo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>         wrote:
>
>         > Hi John,
>         >
>         > I’m late to this thread and have possibly missed some things –
> but a
>         > couple of observations:
>         >
>         > “When I add the zone and get to the storage web page I exclude
> the IPs
>         > already used for the compute node NICs and the NFS server
> itself. …..”
>         > “So the range is 172.30.5.1 -> 15 and the range I fill in is
> 172.30.5.10
>         > -> 172.30.5.14.”
>         >
>         > I think you may have some confusion around the use of the
> storage network.
>         > The important part here is to understand this is for *secondary
> storage*
>         > use only – it has nothing to do with primary storage. This means
> this
>         > storage network needs to be accessible to the SSVM, to the
> hypervisors, and
>         > secondary storage NFS pools needs to be accessible on this
> network.
>         >
>         > The important part – this also means you *can not use the same
> IP ranges
>         > for management and storage networks* - doing so means you will
> have issues
>         > where effectively both hypervisors and SSVM can see the same
> subnet on two
>         > NICs – and you end up in a routing black hole.
>         >
>         > So – you need to either:
>         >
>         > 1) Use different IP subnets on management and storage, or
>         > 2) preferably just simplify your setup – stop using a secondary
> storage
>         > network altogether and just allow secondary storage to use the
> management
>         > network (which is default). Unless you have a very high I/O
> environment in
>         > production you are just adding complexity by running separate
> management
>         > and storage.
>         >
>         > Regards,
>         > Dag Sonstebo
>         > Cloud Architect
>         > ShapeBlue
>         >
>         > On 06/06/2018, 10:18, "Jon Marshall" <jms.123@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>         >
>         >     I will disconnect the host this morning and test but before
> I do that
>         > I ran this command when all hosts are up -
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         >      select * from cloud.host;
>         >     +----+-----------------+------------------------------------
>         > --+--------+--------------------+--------------------+------
>         > -----------+---------------------+--------------------+-----
>         > ------------+---------------------+----------------------+--
>         > ---------------------+-------------------+------------+-----
>         > --------------+-----------------+--------------------+------
>         > ------+----------------+--------+-------------+------+------
>         > -+-------------------------------------+---------+----------
>         > -------+--------------------+------------+----------+-------
>         > ---+--------+------------+--------------+-------------------
>         > --------------------------------------------+-----------+---
>         > ----+-------------+------------+----------------+-----------
>         > ----------+---------------------+---------+--------------+--
>         > --------------+-------+-------------+--------------+
>         >     | id | name            | uuid
>  | status
>         > | type               | private_ip_address | private_netmask |
>         > private_mac_address | storage_ip_address | storage_netmask |
>         > storage_mac_address | storage_ip_address_2 |
> storage_mac_address_2 |
>         > storage_netmask_2 | cluster_id | public_ip_address |
> public_netmask  |
>         > public_mac_address | proxy_port | data_center_id | pod_id |
> cpu_sockets |
>         > cpus | speed | url                                 | fs_type |
>         > hypervisor_type | hypervisor_version | ram        | resource |
> version  |
>         > parent | total_size | capabilities | guid
>         >                         | available | setup | dom0_memory |
> last_ping  |
>         > mgmt_server_id | disconnected        | created             |
> removed |
>         > update_count | resource_state | owner | lastUpdated |
> engine_state |
>         >     +----+-----------------+------------------------------------
>         > --+--------+--------------------+--------------------+------
>         > -----------+---------------------+--------------------+-----
>         > ------------+---------------------+----------------------+--
>         > ---------------------+-------------------+------------+-----
>         > --------------+-----------------+--------------------+------
>         > ------+----------------+--------+-------------+------+------
>         > -+-------------------------------------+---------+----------
>         > -------+--------------------+------------+----------+-------
>         > ---+--------+------------+--------------+-------------------
>         > --------------------------------------------+-----------+---
>         > ----+-------------+------------+----------------+-----------
>         > ----------+---------------------+---------+--------------+--
>         > --------------+-------+-------------+--------------+
>         >     |  1 | dcp-cscn1.local | d97b930c-ab5f-4b7d-9243-eabd60012284
> | Up
>         >  | Routing            | 172.30.3.3         | 255.255.255.192 |
>         > 00:22:19:92:4e:34   | 172.30.3.3         | 255.255.255.192 |
>         > 00:22:19:92:4e:34   | NULL                 | NULL
>   | NULL
>         >             |          1 | 172.30.4.3        | 255.255.255.128 |
>         > 00:22:19:92:4e:35  |       NULL |              1 |      1 |
>      1 |
>         >   2 |  2999 | iqn.1994-05.com.redhat:fa437fb0c023 | NULL    |
> KVM
>         >      | NULL               | 7510159360 | NULL     | 4.11.0.0 |
> NULL   |
>         >    NULL | hvm,snapshot | 9f2b15cb-1b75-321b-bf59-f83e7a5e8efb-
> LibvirtComputingResource
>         > |         1 |     0 |           0 | 1492390408 |   146457912294 |
>         > 2018-06-05 14:09:22 | 2018-06-05 13:44:33 | NULL    |
> 4 |
>         > Enabled        | NULL  | NULL        | Disabled     |
>         >     |  2 | v-2-VM          | ce1f4594-2b4f-4b2b-a239-3f5e2c2215b0
> | Up
>         >  | ConsoleProxy       | 172.30.3.49        | 255.255.255.192 |
>         > 1e:00:80:00:00:14   | 172.30.3.49        | 255.255.255.192 |
>         > 1e:00:80:00:00:14   | NULL                 | NULL
>   | NULL
>         >             |       NULL | 172.30.4.98       | 255.255.255.128 |
>         > 1e:00:c9:00:00:5f  |       NULL |              1 |      1 |
>   NULL |
>         > NULL |  NULL | NoIqn                               | NULL    |
> NULL
>         >     | NULL               |          0 | NULL     | 4.11.0.0 |
> NULL   |
>         >  NULL | NULL         | Proxy.2-ConsoleProxyResource
>         >           |         1 |     0 |           0 | 1492390409 |
>  146457912294 |
>         > 2018-06-05 14:09:22 | 2018-06-05 13:46:22 | NULL    |
> 7 |
>         > Enabled        | NULL  | NULL        | Disabled     |
>         >     |  3 | s-1-VM          | 107d0a8e-e2d1-42b5-8b9d-ff3845bb556c
> | Up
>         >  | SecondaryStorageVM | 172.30.3.34        | 255.255.255.192 |
>         > 1e:00:3b:00:00:05   | 172.30.3.34        | 255.255.255.192 |
>         > 1e:00:3b:00:00:05   | NULL                 | NULL
>   | NULL
>         >             |       NULL | 172.30.4.86       | 255.255.255.128 |
>         > 1e:00:d9:00:00:53  |       NULL |              1 |      1 |
>   NULL |
>         > NULL |  NULL | NoIqn                               | NULL    |
> NULL
>         >     | NULL               |          0 | NULL     | 4.11.0.0 |
> NULL   |
>         >  NULL | NULL         | s-1-VM-NfsSecondaryStorageResource
>         >             |         1 |     0 |           0 | 1492390407 |
>  146457912294
>         > | 2018-06-05 14:09:22 | 2018-06-05 13:46:27 | NULL    |
>   7 |
>         > Enabled        | NULL  | NULL        | Disabled     |
>         >     |  4 | dcp-cscn2.local | f0c076cb-112f-4f4b-a5a4-1a96ffac9794
> | Up
>         >  | Routing            | 172.30.3.4         | 255.255.255.192 |
>         > 00:26:b9:4a:97:7d   | 172.30.3.4         | 255.255.255.192 |
>         > 00:26:b9:4a:97:7d   | NULL                 | NULL
>   | NULL
>         >             |          1 | 172.30.4.4        | 255.255.255.128 |
>         > 00:26:b9:4a:97:7e  |       NULL |              1 |      1 |
>      1 |
>         >   2 |  2999 | iqn.1994-05.com.redhat:e9b4aa7e7881 | NULL    |
> KVM
>         >      | NULL               | 7510159360 | NULL     | 4.11.0.0 |
> NULL   |
>         >    NULL | hvm,snapshot | 40e58399-fc7a-3a59-8f48-16d0f99b11c9-
> LibvirtComputingResource
>         > |         1 |     0 |           0 | 1492450882 |   146457912294 |
>         > 2018-06-05 14:09:22 | 2018-06-05 13:46:33 | NULL    |
> 8 |
>         > Enabled        | NULL  | NULL        | Disabled     |
>         >     |  5 | dcp-cscn3.local | 0368ae16-550f-43a9-bb40-ee29d2b5c274
> | Up
>         >  | Routing            | 172.30.3.5         | 255.255.255.192 |
>         > 00:24:e8:73:6a:b2   | 172.30.3.5         | 255.255.255.192 |
>         > 00:24:e8:73:6a:b2   | NULL                 | NULL
>   | NULL
>         >             |          1 | 172.30.4.5        | 255.255.255.128 |
>         > 00:24:e8:73:6a:b3  |       NULL |              1 |      1 |
>      1 |
>         >   2 |  3000 | iqn.1994-05.com.redhat:ccdce43aff1c | NULL    |
> KVM
>         >      | NULL               | 7510159360 | NULL     | 4.11.0.0 |
> NULL   |
>         >    NULL | hvm,snapshot | 10bb1c01-0e92-3108-8209-37f3eebad8fb-
> LibvirtComputingResource
>         > |         1 |     0 |           0 | 1492390408 |   146457912294 |
>         > 2018-06-05 14:09:22 | 2018-06-05 13:47:04 | NULL    |
> 6 |
>         > Enabled        | NULL  | NULL        | Disabled     |
>         >     +----+-----------------+------------------------------------
>         > --+--------+--------------------+--------------------+------
>         > -----------+---------------------+--------------------+-----
>         > ------------+---------------------+----------------------+--
>         > ---------------------+-------------------+------------+-----
>         > --------------+-----------------+--------------------+------
>         > ------+----------------+--------+-------------+------+------
>         > -+-------------------------------------+---------+----------
>         > -------+--------------------+------------+----------+-------
>         > ---+--------+------------+--------------+-------------------
>         > --------------------------------------------+-----------+---
>         > ----+-------------+------------+----------------+-----------
>         > ----------+---------------------+---------+--------------+--
>         > --------------+-------+-------------+--------------+
>         >     5 rows in set (0.00 sec)
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         >     and you can see that it says the storage IP address is the
> same as the
>         > private IP address (the management network).
>         >
>         >
>         >     I also ran the command you provided using the Cluster ID
> number from
>         > the table above -
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         >     mysql> select * from cloud.storage_pool where cluster_id = 1
> and
>         > removed is not null;
>         >     Empty set (0.00 sec)
>         >
>         >     mysql>
>         >
>         >     So assuming I am reading this correctly that seems to be the
> issue.
>         >
>         >
>         >     I am at a loss as to why though.
>         >
>         >
>         >     I have a separate NIC for storage as described. When I add
> the zone
>         > and get to the storage web page I exclude the IPs already used
> for the
>         > compute node NICs and the NFS server itself. I do this because
> initially I
>         > didn't and the SSVM started using the IP address of the NFS
> server.
>         >
>         >
>         >     So the range is 172.30.5.1 -> 15 and the range I fill in is
>         > 172.30.5.10 -> 172.30.5.14.
>         >
>         >
>         >     And I used the label "cloudbr2" for storage.
>         >
>         >
>         >     I must be doing this wrong somehow.
>         >
>         >
>         >     Any pointers would be much appreciated.
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         >     ________________________________
>         >     From: Rafael Weingärtner <rafaelweingartner@xxxxxxxxx>
>         >     Sent: 05 June 2018 16:13
>         >     To: users
>         >     Subject: Re: advanced networking with public IPs direct to
> VMs
>         >
>         >     That is interesting. Let's see the source of all truth...
>         >     This is the code that is generating that odd message.
>         >
>         >     >     List<StoragePoolVO> clusterPools =
>         >     > _storagePoolDao.listPoolsByCluster(agent.getClusterId());
>         >     >         boolean hasNfs = false;
>         >     >         for (StoragePoolVO pool : clusterPools) {
>         >     >             if (pool.getPoolType() == StoragePoolType.
> NetworkFilesystem)
>         > {
>         >     >                 hasNfs = true;
>         >     >                 break;
>         >     >             }
>         >     >         }
>         >     >         if (!hasNfs) {
>         >     >             s_logger.warn(
>         >     >                     "Agent investigation was requested on
> host " +
>         > agent +
>         >     > ", but host does not support investigation because it has
> no NFS
>         > storage.
>         >     > Skipping investigation.");
>         >     >             return Status.Disconnected;
>         >     >         }
>         >     >
>         >
>         >     There are two possibilities here. You do not have any NFS
> storage? Is
>         > that
>         >     the case? Or maybe, for some reason, the call
>         >     "_storagePoolDao.listPoolsByCluster(agent.getClusterId())"
> is not
>         > returning
>         >     any NFS storage pools. Looking at the "listPoolsByCluster "
> we will see
>         >     that the following SQL is used:
>         >
>         >     Select * from storage_pool where cluster_id =
> <host'sClusterId> and
>         > removed
>         >     > is not null
>         >     >
>         >
>         >     Can you run that SQL to see the its return when your hosts
> are marked
>         > as
>         >     disconnected?
>         >
>         >
>         > Dag.Sonstebo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>         > www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
Shapeblue - The CloudStack Company<http://www.shapeblue.com/>
www.shapeblue.com
ShapeBlue are the largest independent integrator of CloudStack technologies globally and are specialists in the design and implementation of IaaS cloud infrastructures for both private and public cloud implementations.



>         Shapeblue - The CloudStack Company<http://www.shapeblue.com/>
>         www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
>         ShapeBlue are the largest independent integrator of CloudStack
> technologies globally and are specialists in the design and implementation
> of IaaS cloud infrastructures for both private and public cloud
> implementations.
>
>
>
>         > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
>         > @shapeblue
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         > On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 11:32 AM, Jon Marshall <
> jms.123@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>         > wrote:
>         >
>         >     > I reran the tests with the 3 NIC setup. When I configured
> the zone
>         > through
>         >     > the UI I used the labels cloudbr0 for management, cloudbr1
> for guest
>         >     > traffic and cloudbr2 for NFS as per my original response
> to you.
>         >     >
>         >     >
>         >     > When I pull the power to the node (dcp-cscn2.local) after
> about 5
>         > mins
>         >     > the  host status goes to "Alert" but never to "Down"
>         >     >
>         >     >
>         >     > I get this in the logs -
>         >     >
>         >     >
>         >     > 2018-06-05 15:17:14,382 WARN  [c.c.h.KVMInvestigator]
>         >     > (AgentTaskPool-1:ctx-f4da4dc9) (logid:138e9a93) Agent
> investigation
>         > was
>         >     > requested on host Host[-4-Routing], but host does not
> support
>         > investigation
>         >     > because it has no NFS storage. Skipping investigation.
>         >     > 2018-06-05 15:17:14,382 DEBUG [c.c.h.
> HighAvailabilityManagerImpl]
>         >     > (AgentTaskPool-1:ctx-f4da4dc9) (logid:138e9a93)
> KVMInvestigator was
>         > able to
>         >     > determine host 4 is in Disconnected
>         >     > 2018-06-05 15:17:14,382 INFO  [c.c.a.m.AgentManagerImpl]
>         >     > (AgentTaskPool-1:ctx-f4da4dc9) (logid:138e9a93) The agent
> from host
>         > 4 state
>         >     > determined is Disconnected
>         >     > 2018-06-05 15:17:14,382 WARN  [c.c.a.m.AgentManagerImpl]
>         >     > (AgentTaskPool-1:ctx-f4da4dc9) (logid:138e9a93) Agent is
>         > disconnected but
>         >     > the host is still up: 4-dcp-cscn2.local
>         >     >
>         >     > I don't understand why it thinks there is no NFS storage
> as each
>         > compute
>         >     > node has a dedicated storage NIC.
>         >     >
>         >     >
>         >     > I also don't understand why it thinks the host is still up
> ie. what
>         > test
>         >     > is it doing to determine that ?
>         >     >
>         >     >
>         >     > Am I just trying to get something working that is not
> supported ?
>         >     >
>         >     >
>         >     > ________________________________
>         >     > From: Rafael Weingärtner <rafaelweingartner@xxxxxxxxx>
>         >     > Sent: 04 June 2018 15:31
>         >     > To: users
>         >     > Subject: Re: advanced networking with public IPs direct to
> VMs
>         >     >
>         >     > What type of failover are you talking about?
>         >     > What ACS version are you using?
>         >     > What hypervisor are you using?
>         >     > How are you configuring your NICs in the hypervisor?
>         >     > How are you configuring the traffic labels in ACS?
>         >     >
>         >     > On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 11:29 AM, Jon Marshall <
> jms.123@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>         > >
>         >     > wrote:
>         >     >
>         >     > > Hi all
>         >     > >
>         >     > >
>         >     > > I am close to giving up on basic networking as I just
> cannot get
>         > failover
>         >     > > working with multiple NICs (I am not even sure it is
> supported).
>         >     > >
>         >     > >
>         >     > > What I would like is to use 3 NICs for management,
> storage and
>         > guest
>         >     > > traffic. I would like to assign public IPs direct to the
> VMs which
>         > is
>         >     > why I
>         >     > > originally chose basic.
>         >     > >
>         >     > >
>         >     > > If I switch to advanced networking do I just configure a
> guest VM
>         > with
>         >     > > public IPs on one NIC and not both with the public
> traffic -
>         >     > >
>         >     > >
>         >     > > would this work ?
>         >     > >
>         >     >
>         >     >
>         >     >
>         >     > --
>         >     > Rafael Weingärtner
>         >     >
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         >     --
>         >     Rafael Weingärtner
>         >
>         >
>         >
>
>
>         --
>         Rafael Weingärtner
>
>
>
>     Dag.Sonstebo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>     www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
>     53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
>     @shapeblue
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Dag.Sonstebo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
>


--
Rafael Weingärtner


( ! ) Warning: include(msgfooter.php): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /var/www/git/apache-cloudstack-users/msg03435.html on line 829
Call Stack
#TimeMemoryFunctionLocation
10.0012401464{main}( ).../msg03435.html:0

( ! ) Warning: include(): Failed opening 'msgfooter.php' for inclusion (include_path='.:/var/www/git') in /var/www/git/apache-cloudstack-users/msg03435.html on line 829
Call Stack
#TimeMemoryFunctionLocation
10.0012401464{main}( ).../msg03435.html:0