git.net

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5


+1 (binding)

I performed manual testing of a Basic Zone making use of vSphere and XenServer.

On 11/16/18, 5:49 AM, "Paul Angus" <paul.angus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

    NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
    
    
    
    
    We're looking good so far, but I'd still like some more votes (hopefully +1s 😊 ), Please do test and cast your vote.
    
    Thanks.
    
    
    Kind regards,
    
    Paul Angus
    
    paul.angus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
    www.shapeblue.com
    Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK
    @shapeblue
    
    
    
    
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Andrija Panic <andrija.panic@xxxxxxxxx>
    Sent: 16 November 2018 12:12
    To: dev <dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
    
    +1
    
    Tested:
    - KVM environment
    - building DEB packages for Ubuntu
    - advanced and basic zone deployment, MGMT srv on Ubuntu 14.04, KVM Ubuntu
    14.04 (qemu versions equivalent to Ubuntu 16.04)
    - a bunch of integration tests done from in-house suite of tests (system and user tests)
    - online and offline storage migration from NFS/CEPH to SolidFire
    
    
    On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 at 10:13, Dag Sonstebo <Dag.Sonstebo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    wrote:
    
    > +1
    >
    > Various customer related configurations and lifecycle operations, all
    > looking good.
    >
    > Environment:
    > - Mgmt: CentOS7.5
    > - HV: VMware 5.5
    > - Advanced zone
    >
    > Regards,
    > Dag Sonstebo
    > Cloud Architect
    > ShapeBlue
    >
    > On 16/11/2018, 08:48, "Boris Stoyanov" <boris.stoyanov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    > wrote:
    >
    >     +1
    >
    >     I’ve did an upgrade all the way from 4.6 to rc5 and it was
    > successful, I’ve also managed to run some basic lifecycle operation
    > and it was looking good.
    >
    >     Regards,
    >     Bobby.
    >
    >
    >     boris.stoyanov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
    >     www.shapeblue.com
    >     Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK
    >     @shapeblue
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > Dag.Sonstebo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
    > www.shapeblue.com
    > Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK @shapeblue
    >
    >
    >
    > > On 15 Nov 2018, at 21:44, Gabriel Beims Bräscher <gabrascher@xxxxxxxxx>
    > wrote:
    >     >
    >     > +1 Deployed local environment and tested VM/host/storage lifecycles.
    >     >
    >     > Hosts: KVM running on Ubuntu 16.04
    >     > Management server and database: running on Ubuntu 16.04
    >     > - create/use/delete system and user VMs
    >     > - register new template
    >     > - register service offering
    >     > - work with hosts (add, maintenance, remove)
    >     >
    >     > Em qui, 15 de nov de 2018 às 03:21, Tutkowski, Mike <
    >     > Mike.Tutkowski@xxxxxxxxxx> escreveu:
    >     >
    >     >> Thanks, Rohit!
    >     >>
    >     >>
    >     >> ________________________________
    >     >> From: Rohit Yadav <rohit.yadav@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    >     >> Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2018 9:07 PM
    >     >> To: dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    >     >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
    >     >>
    >     >> NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click
    > links or
    >     >> open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the
    > content is
    >     >> safe.
    >     >>
    >     >>
    >     >>
    >     >>
    >     >> Hi Mike, Paul, everyone,
    >     >>
    >     >>
    >     >> I tested the same on a 4.9.3.1 based VMware 5.5u3 + svs + basic
    > zone and
    >     >> could see the same behaviour. Therefore, it's not a regression but a
    >     >> limitation from the past. Basic zone provides L3 isolation by means
    > of
    >     >> security group (host-level firewall) which is not supported for
    > VMware. I
    >     >> think nobody reported this in the past because nobody uses
    > VMware+basic
    >     >> zone, I've opened an issue for this issue:
    >     >> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/3031
    >     >>
    >     >>
    >     >> Let's continue testing and voting for RC5, and let's aim to fix for
    > this
    >     >> limitation in future 4.11.3+, 4.12.0+.
    >     >>
    >     >>
    >     >> - Rohit
    >     >>
    >     >> <https://cloudstack.apache.org>
    >     >>
    >     >>
    >     >>
    >     >> ________________________________
    >     >> From: Tutkowski, Mike <Mike.Tutkowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
    >     >> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2018 4:24:46 AM
    >     >> To: dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    >     >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
    >     >>
    >     >> I should note that I’m running vSphere 5.5, by the way. I believe
    > that’s
    >     >> still supported in CS 4.11.
    >     >>
    >     >> On 11/14/18, 3:52 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" <Mike.Tutkowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
    > wrote:
    >     >>
    >     >> NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click
    > links or
    >     >> open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the
    > content is
    >     >> safe.
    >     >>
    >     >>
    >     >>
    >     >>
    >     >> The VR doesn’t show as having an IP address.
    >     >>
    >     >> On 11/14/18, 3:50 PM, "Paul Angus" <paul.angus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    > wrote:
    >     >>
    >     >> NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click
    > links or
    >     >> open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the
    > content is
    >     >> safe.
    >     >>
    >     >>
    >     >>
    >     >>
    >     >> Mgmt. server should ssh into VR.
    >     >> I'll fire a similar build in out lab.
    >     >>
    >     >>
    >     >> paul.angus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
    >     >> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
    >     >> Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK
    >     >> @shapeblue
    >     >>
    >     >>
    >     >>
    >     >>
    >     >> -----Original Message-----
    >     >> From: Tutkowski, Mike <Mike.Tutkowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
    >     >> Sent: 14 November 2018 22:41
    >     >> To: dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    >     >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
    >     >>
    >     >> Right, I’ve compiled and run with –Dnoredist. The SSVM and CPVM
    > come up
    >     >> fine. They both show the VM and agent running. The VR boots up. I
    > can see
    >     >> it at the login prompt in vSphere Client. I don’t see any obvious
    > errors in
    >     >> cloud.log. Maybe a port is blocked and it can’t talk to the
    > management
    >     >> server?
    >     >>
    >     >> On 11/14/18, 3:10 PM, "Paul Angus" <paul.angus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    > wrote:
    >     >>
    >     >> NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click
    > links or
    >     >> open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the
    > content is
    >     >> safe.
    >     >>
    >     >>
    >     >>
    >     >>
    >     >> I've tested in an ubuntu16 basic zone but not vmware basic zone - I
    > guess
    >     >> that it goes without say that you know to use build nonoss from
    > vmware...
    >     >> have you used the 6.5 sdk ?
    >     >> I think that it always says requires upgrade until the VR checks in.
    >     >> Have the SSVM and CPVM checked in ok? If you go on the VR through
    > the
    >     >> vCenter console what do you see?
    >     >>
    >     >> paul.angus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
    >     >> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
    >     >> Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK
    >     >> @shapeblue
    >     >>
    >     >>
    >     >>
    >     >>
    >     >> -----Original Message-----
    >     >> From: Tutkowski, Mike <Mike.Tutkowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
    >     >> Sent: 14 November 2018 21:16
    >     >> To: dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    >     >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
    >     >>
    >     >> I’m having a hard time getting the VR with vSphere to come up
    > successfully.
    >     >>
    >     >> I built the code from source (the specified commit) and am using the
    >     >> system VM template specified in this e-mail chain.
    >     >>
    >     >> I’m running in a Basic Zone. When I look at the details for the VR
    > in the
    >     >> GUI, it says Requires Upgrade is Yes. When I click the button to
    > upgrade
    >     >> the template, the operation fails.
    >     >>
    >     >> Thoughts?
    >     >>
    >     >> On 11/13/18, 6:59 AM, "Paul Angus" <paul.angus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    > wrote:
    >     >>
    >     >> NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click
    > links or
    >     >> open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the
    > content is
    >     >> safe.
    >     >>
    >     >>
    >     >>
    >     >>
    >     >> Hi All,
    >     >>
    >     >> I've created a 4.11.2.0 release (RC5), with the following artefacts
    > up for
    >     >> testing and a vote:
    >     >>
    >     >>
    >     >> Git Branch and Commit SH:
    >     >>
    >     >>
    > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.11.2.0-RC20181113T0924
    >     >> Commit: 5aae410dfce2bef5cc21a0892370cb5d0628f681
    >     >>
    >     >> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
    >     >> location):
    >     >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.11.2.0/
    >     >>
    >     >> PGP release keys (signed using 51EE0BC8):
    >     >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
    >     >>
    >     >> The vote will be open for 72 hours - until 14:00 GMT on Friday 16th
    > Nov.
    >     >>
    >     >> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
    >     >> indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
    >     >>
    >     >> [ ] +1 approve
    >     >> [ ] +0 no opinion
    >     >> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
    >     >>
    >     >> Additional information:
    >     >>
    >     >> For users' convenience, I've built packages from
    >     >> 5aae410dfce2bef5cc21a0892370cb5d0628f681 and published RC5
    > repository here:
    >     >> http://packages.shapeblue.com/testing/41120rc5/
    >     >>
    >     >> The release notes are still work-in-progress, but the systemvm
    > template
    >     >> upgrade section has been updated.
    >     >>
    >     >> 4.11.2.0 systemvm templates are available from here:
    >     >> http://packages.shapeblue.com/testing/systemvm/41120rc5/
    >     >>
    >     >> Only the following changes have been added to RC5:
    >     >>
    >     >>
    >     >>
    > +-------------------------+----------+---------------+----------+------------------------------------------------------------+
    >     >> | Version | Github | Type | Priority | Description |
    >     >>
    >     >>
    > +=========================+==========+===============+==========+============================================================+
    >     >> | 4.11.2.0 | `#3018`_ | | | Prevent error on GroupAnswers on VR
    > creation |
    >     >>
    >     >>
    > +-------------------------+----------+---------------+----------+------------------------------------------------------------+
    >     >> | 4.11.2.0 | `#3007`_ | | | Add missing ConfigDrive entries on
    > existing
    >     >> zones after |
    >     >> | | | | | upgrade |
    >     >>
    >     >>
    > +-------------------------+----------+---------------+----------+------------------------------------------------------------+
    >     >> | 4.11.2.0 | `#2980`_ | | | [4.11] Fix set initial reservation on
    > public
    >     >> IP ranges |
    >     >>
    >     >>
    > +-------------------------+----------+---------------+----------+------------------------------------------------------------+
    >     >> | 4.11.2.0 | `#3010`_ | | | Fix DirectNetworkGuru canHandle checks
    > for
    >     >> lowercase |
    >     >> | | | | | isolation methods |
    >     >>
    >     >>
    > +-------------------------+----------+---------------+----------+------------------------------------------------------------+
    >     >>
    >     >> .. _`#3012`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3012
    >     >> .. _`#3018`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3018
    >     >> .. _`#3007`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3007
    >     >> .. _`#2980`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2980
    >     >> .. _`#3010`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3010
    >     >>
    >     >>
    >     >>
    >     >> Kind regards,
    >     >>
    >     >> Paul Angus
    >     >>
    >     >>
    >     >> paul.angus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
    >     >> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
    >     >> Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK
    >     >> @shapeblue
    >     >>
    >     >>
    >     >>
    >     >>
    >     >>
    >     >>
    >     >>
    >     >>
    >     >>
    >     >>
    >     >>
    >     >>
    >     >> rohit.yadav@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
    >     >> www.shapeblue.com
    >     >> Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK
    >     >> @shapeblue
    >     >>
    >     >>
    >     >>
    >     >>
    >
    >
    >
    >
    
    --
    
    Andrija Panić