git.net

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5


We're looking good so far, but I'd still like some more votes (hopefully +1s 😊 ), Please do test and cast your vote.

Thanks.


Kind regards,

Paul Angus

paul.angus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
www.shapeblue.com
Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK
@shapeblue
  
 


-----Original Message-----
From: Andrija Panic <andrija.panic@xxxxxxxxx> 
Sent: 16 November 2018 12:12
To: dev <dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

+1

Tested:
- KVM environment
- building DEB packages for Ubuntu
- advanced and basic zone deployment, MGMT srv on Ubuntu 14.04, KVM Ubuntu
14.04 (qemu versions equivalent to Ubuntu 16.04)
- a bunch of integration tests done from in-house suite of tests (system and user tests)
- online and offline storage migration from NFS/CEPH to SolidFire


On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 at 10:13, Dag Sonstebo <Dag.Sonstebo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

> +1
>
> Various customer related configurations and lifecycle operations, all 
> looking good.
>
> Environment:
> - Mgmt: CentOS7.5
> - HV: VMware 5.5
> - Advanced zone
>
> Regards,
> Dag Sonstebo
> Cloud Architect
> ShapeBlue
>
> On 16/11/2018, 08:48, "Boris Stoyanov" <boris.stoyanov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>     +1
>
>     I’ve did an upgrade all the way from 4.6 to rc5 and it was 
> successful, I’ve also managed to run some basic lifecycle operation 
> and it was looking good.
>
>     Regards,
>     Bobby.
>
>
>     boris.stoyanov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>     www.shapeblue.com
>     Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK
>     @shapeblue
>
>
>
>
> Dag.Sonstebo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> www.shapeblue.com
> Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK @shapeblue
>
>
>
> > On 15 Nov 2018, at 21:44, Gabriel Beims Bräscher <gabrascher@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>     >
>     > +1 Deployed local environment and tested VM/host/storage lifecycles.
>     >
>     > Hosts: KVM running on Ubuntu 16.04
>     > Management server and database: running on Ubuntu 16.04
>     > - create/use/delete system and user VMs
>     > - register new template
>     > - register service offering
>     > - work with hosts (add, maintenance, remove)
>     >
>     > Em qui, 15 de nov de 2018 às 03:21, Tutkowski, Mike <
>     > Mike.Tutkowski@xxxxxxxxxx> escreveu:
>     >
>     >> Thanks, Rohit!
>     >>
>     >>
>     >> ________________________________
>     >> From: Rohit Yadav <rohit.yadav@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>     >> Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2018 9:07 PM
>     >> To: dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>     >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
>     >>
>     >> NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click
> links or
>     >> open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the
> content is
>     >> safe.
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >> Hi Mike, Paul, everyone,
>     >>
>     >>
>     >> I tested the same on a 4.9.3.1 based VMware 5.5u3 + svs + basic
> zone and
>     >> could see the same behaviour. Therefore, it's not a regression but a
>     >> limitation from the past. Basic zone provides L3 isolation by means
> of
>     >> security group (host-level firewall) which is not supported for
> VMware. I
>     >> think nobody reported this in the past because nobody uses
> VMware+basic
>     >> zone, I've opened an issue for this issue:
>     >> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/3031
>     >>
>     >>
>     >> Let's continue testing and voting for RC5, and let's aim to fix for
> this
>     >> limitation in future 4.11.3+, 4.12.0+.
>     >>
>     >>
>     >> - Rohit
>     >>
>     >> <https://cloudstack.apache.org>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >> ________________________________
>     >> From: Tutkowski, Mike <Mike.Tutkowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
>     >> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2018 4:24:46 AM
>     >> To: dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>     >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
>     >>
>     >> I should note that I’m running vSphere 5.5, by the way. I believe
> that’s
>     >> still supported in CS 4.11.
>     >>
>     >> On 11/14/18, 3:52 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" <Mike.Tutkowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>     >>
>     >> NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click
> links or
>     >> open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the
> content is
>     >> safe.
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >> The VR doesn’t show as having an IP address.
>     >>
>     >> On 11/14/18, 3:50 PM, "Paul Angus" <paul.angus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>     >>
>     >> NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click
> links or
>     >> open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the
> content is
>     >> safe.
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >> Mgmt. server should ssh into VR.
>     >> I'll fire a similar build in out lab.
>     >>
>     >>
>     >> paul.angus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>     >> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
>     >> Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK
>     >> @shapeblue
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >> -----Original Message-----
>     >> From: Tutkowski, Mike <Mike.Tutkowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
>     >> Sent: 14 November 2018 22:41
>     >> To: dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>     >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
>     >>
>     >> Right, I’ve compiled and run with –Dnoredist. The SSVM and CPVM
> come up
>     >> fine. They both show the VM and agent running. The VR boots up. I
> can see
>     >> it at the login prompt in vSphere Client. I don’t see any obvious
> errors in
>     >> cloud.log. Maybe a port is blocked and it can’t talk to the
> management
>     >> server?
>     >>
>     >> On 11/14/18, 3:10 PM, "Paul Angus" <paul.angus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>     >>
>     >> NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click
> links or
>     >> open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the
> content is
>     >> safe.
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >> I've tested in an ubuntu16 basic zone but not vmware basic zone - I
> guess
>     >> that it goes without say that you know to use build nonoss from
> vmware...
>     >> have you used the 6.5 sdk ?
>     >> I think that it always says requires upgrade until the VR checks in.
>     >> Have the SSVM and CPVM checked in ok? If you go on the VR through
> the
>     >> vCenter console what do you see?
>     >>
>     >> paul.angus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>     >> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
>     >> Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK
>     >> @shapeblue
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >> -----Original Message-----
>     >> From: Tutkowski, Mike <Mike.Tutkowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
>     >> Sent: 14 November 2018 21:16
>     >> To: dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>     >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
>     >>
>     >> I’m having a hard time getting the VR with vSphere to come up
> successfully.
>     >>
>     >> I built the code from source (the specified commit) and am using the
>     >> system VM template specified in this e-mail chain.
>     >>
>     >> I’m running in a Basic Zone. When I look at the details for the VR
> in the
>     >> GUI, it says Requires Upgrade is Yes. When I click the button to
> upgrade
>     >> the template, the operation fails.
>     >>
>     >> Thoughts?
>     >>
>     >> On 11/13/18, 6:59 AM, "Paul Angus" <paul.angus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>     >>
>     >> NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click
> links or
>     >> open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the
> content is
>     >> safe.
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >> Hi All,
>     >>
>     >> I've created a 4.11.2.0 release (RC5), with the following artefacts
> up for
>     >> testing and a vote:
>     >>
>     >>
>     >> Git Branch and Commit SH:
>     >>
>     >>
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.11.2.0-RC20181113T0924
>     >> Commit: 5aae410dfce2bef5cc21a0892370cb5d0628f681
>     >>
>     >> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
>     >> location):
>     >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.11.2.0/
>     >>
>     >> PGP release keys (signed using 51EE0BC8):
>     >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>     >>
>     >> The vote will be open for 72 hours - until 14:00 GMT on Friday 16th
> Nov.
>     >>
>     >> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
>     >> indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>     >>
>     >> [ ] +1 approve
>     >> [ ] +0 no opinion
>     >> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>     >>
>     >> Additional information:
>     >>
>     >> For users' convenience, I've built packages from
>     >> 5aae410dfce2bef5cc21a0892370cb5d0628f681 and published RC5
> repository here:
>     >> http://packages.shapeblue.com/testing/41120rc5/
>     >>
>     >> The release notes are still work-in-progress, but the systemvm
> template
>     >> upgrade section has been updated.
>     >>
>     >> 4.11.2.0 systemvm templates are available from here:
>     >> http://packages.shapeblue.com/testing/systemvm/41120rc5/
>     >>
>     >> Only the following changes have been added to RC5:
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>
> +-------------------------+----------+---------------+----------+------------------------------------------------------------+
>     >> | Version | Github | Type | Priority | Description |
>     >>
>     >>
> +=========================+==========+===============+==========+============================================================+
>     >> | 4.11.2.0 | `#3018`_ | | | Prevent error on GroupAnswers on VR
> creation |
>     >>
>     >>
> +-------------------------+----------+---------------+----------+------------------------------------------------------------+
>     >> | 4.11.2.0 | `#3007`_ | | | Add missing ConfigDrive entries on
> existing
>     >> zones after |
>     >> | | | | | upgrade |
>     >>
>     >>
> +-------------------------+----------+---------------+----------+------------------------------------------------------------+
>     >> | 4.11.2.0 | `#2980`_ | | | [4.11] Fix set initial reservation on
> public
>     >> IP ranges |
>     >>
>     >>
> +-------------------------+----------+---------------+----------+------------------------------------------------------------+
>     >> | 4.11.2.0 | `#3010`_ | | | Fix DirectNetworkGuru canHandle checks
> for
>     >> lowercase |
>     >> | | | | | isolation methods |
>     >>
>     >>
> +-------------------------+----------+---------------+----------+------------------------------------------------------------+
>     >>
>     >> .. _`#3012`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3012
>     >> .. _`#3018`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3018
>     >> .. _`#3007`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3007
>     >> .. _`#2980`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2980
>     >> .. _`#3010`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3010
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >> Kind regards,
>     >>
>     >> Paul Angus
>     >>
>     >>
>     >> paul.angus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>     >> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
>     >> Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK
>     >> @shapeblue
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >> rohit.yadav@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>     >> www.shapeblue.com
>     >> Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK
>     >> @shapeblue
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>
>
>
>
>

-- 

Andrija Panić