git.net

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Multiple Physical Networks in Basic Networking (KVM)


Hi Ivan,

Not quite – “advanced zone with security group” allows you to have multiple “basic” type networks isolated within their own VLANs and with security groups isolation between VMs / accounts. The VR only does DNS/DHCP, not GW/NAT.

Regards,
Dag Sonstebo
Cloud Architect
ShapeBlue

On 08/06/2018, 14:26, "Ivan Kudryavtsev" <kudryavtsev_ia@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

    Hi, Dag. Not exactly. Advanced zone uses VR as a GW with SNAT/DNAT which is
    not quite good for public cloud in my case. Despite that it really solves
    the problem. But I would like to have it as simple as possible, without VR
    as a GW and xNAT.
    
    пт, 8 июн. 2018 г., 15:21 Dag Sonstebo <Dag.Sonstebo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
    
    > Wido / Ivan – I’m probably missing something – but is the feature you are
    > looking for not the same functionality we currently have in “advanced zones
    > with security groups”?
    >
    > Regards,
    > Dag Sonstebo
    > Cloud Architect
    > ShapeBlue
    >
    > On 08/06/2018, 14:14, "Ivan Kudryavtsev" <kudryavtsev_ia@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
    >
    >     Hi Wido, I also very interested in similar deployment, especially
    > combined
    >     with the capability of setting different network bandwidth for
    > different
    >     networks, like
    >     10.0.0.0/8 intra dc with 1g bandwidth per vm and white ipv4/ipv6 with
    >     regular bandwidth management. But it seem it takes very big redesign
    > of VM
    >     settings and VR redesign is also required.
    >
    >     When I tried to investigate if it possible with ACS basic network,
    > didn't
    >     succeed with any relevant information.
    >
    >
    >     пт, 8 июн. 2018 г., 14:56 Wido den Hollander <wido@xxxxxxxxx>:
    >
    >     > Hi,
    >     >
    >     > I am looking into supporting multiple Physical Networks inside onze
    >     > Basic Networking zone.
    >     >
    >     > First: The reason we use Basic Networking is the simplicity and the
    > fact
    >     > that our (Juniper) routers can do the routing and not the VR.
    >     >
    >     > ALL our VMs have external IPv4/IPv6 addresses and we do not use NAT
    >     > anywhere.
    >     >
    >     > But right now a Hypervisor has a single VLAN/POD going to it
    > terminated
    >     > on 'cloudbr0' using vlan://untagged.
    >     >
    >     > But to better utilize our physical hardware it would be great it
    > Basic
    >     > Networking would support multiple physical networks using VLAN
    > separation.
    >     >
    >     > For example:
    >     >
    >     > - PhysicalNetwork1: VLAN 100
    >     > - PhysicalNetwork2: VLAN 101
    >     > - PhysicalNetwork3: VLAN 102
    >     >
    >     > I've been looking into DirectAttached with Advanced Networking, but I
    >     > couldn't find any reference to it on how that exactly works.
    >     >
    >     > Right now for our use-case Basic Networking with multiple Physical
    >     > Networks would work best for us.
    >     >
    >     > Has anybody looked at this or has any insight of the problems we
    > might
    >     > run in to?
    >     >
    >     > Wido
    >     >
    >
    >
    >
    > Dag.Sonstebo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
    > www.shapeblue.com
    > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
    > @shapeblue
    >
    >
    >
    >
    


Dag.Sonstebo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue