git.net

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Multiple Physical Networks in Basic Networking (KVM)


Hi, Dag. Not exactly. Advanced zone uses VR as a GW with SNAT/DNAT which is
not quite good for public cloud in my case. Despite that it really solves
the problem. But I would like to have it as simple as possible, without VR
as a GW and xNAT.

пт, 8 июн. 2018 г., 15:21 Dag Sonstebo <Dag.Sonstebo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

> Wido / Ivan – I’m probably missing something – but is the feature you are
> looking for not the same functionality we currently have in “advanced zones
> with security groups”?
>
> Regards,
> Dag Sonstebo
> Cloud Architect
> ShapeBlue
>
> On 08/06/2018, 14:14, "Ivan Kudryavtsev" <kudryavtsev_ia@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>     Hi Wido, I also very interested in similar deployment, especially
> combined
>     with the capability of setting different network bandwidth for
> different
>     networks, like
>     10.0.0.0/8 intra dc with 1g bandwidth per vm and white ipv4/ipv6 with
>     regular bandwidth management. But it seem it takes very big redesign
> of VM
>     settings and VR redesign is also required.
>
>     When I tried to investigate if it possible with ACS basic network,
> didn't
>     succeed with any relevant information.
>
>
>     пт, 8 июн. 2018 г., 14:56 Wido den Hollander <wido@xxxxxxxxx>:
>
>     > Hi,
>     >
>     > I am looking into supporting multiple Physical Networks inside onze
>     > Basic Networking zone.
>     >
>     > First: The reason we use Basic Networking is the simplicity and the
> fact
>     > that our (Juniper) routers can do the routing and not the VR.
>     >
>     > ALL our VMs have external IPv4/IPv6 addresses and we do not use NAT
>     > anywhere.
>     >
>     > But right now a Hypervisor has a single VLAN/POD going to it
> terminated
>     > on 'cloudbr0' using vlan://untagged.
>     >
>     > But to better utilize our physical hardware it would be great it
> Basic
>     > Networking would support multiple physical networks using VLAN
> separation.
>     >
>     > For example:
>     >
>     > - PhysicalNetwork1: VLAN 100
>     > - PhysicalNetwork2: VLAN 101
>     > - PhysicalNetwork3: VLAN 102
>     >
>     > I've been looking into DirectAttached with Advanced Networking, but I
>     > couldn't find any reference to it on how that exactly works.
>     >
>     > Right now for our use-case Basic Networking with multiple Physical
>     > Networks would work best for us.
>     >
>     > Has anybody looked at this or has any insight of the problems we
> might
>     > run in to?
>     >
>     > Wido
>     >
>
>
>
> Dag.Sonstebo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
>