git.net

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 4.11.1 RC / VMs with UserDispersingPlanner won't deploy


Hi Ivan,

OK – understand – if those are the tags used then IMO it should work, and yes agree, userdisperseplanning should’t kick in with 0 VMs.

Could the issue be with tagging rather than userdispersing:
    >> (logid:5ee25964) The clusterId list for the given offering tag: []

This looks like it can’t find any clusters with given tag (even though you have them set)

     >> 2018-05-30 16:31:35,486 DEBUG [c.c.d.FirstFitPlanner]
     >> (API-Job-Executor-10:ctx-b36a77ea job-156334 ctx-9c358aab)
     >> (logid:5ee25964) No clusters found after removing disabled clusters and clusters in avoid list, returning.

I appreciate I’m asking the obvious here so forgive me – but you’ve definitely not got disabled clusters (“after removing disabled clusters”)?

Regards,
Dag Sonstebo
Cloud Architect
ShapeBlue

On 30/05/2018, 11:43, "Ivan Kudryavtsev" <kudryavtsev_ia@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

    Hi, Dag. Thank you very much, I really know that
    
    What I have in my cloud:
    
    Two local storage KVM hosts:
    Host tags: PERMIT,HIGHCPU
    Storage tags: PERMIT
    
    I have service offering with tags:
    Host tags: PERMIT,HIGHCPU
    Storage tags: PERMIT
    
    I don't have hosts without that labels at all, but, VM doesn't deploy even
    if no anti-affinity is set, so no constraints should be breached. Also, I
    don't catch how UserDispersingPlanner may interfere, if I have 0 VMs
    deployed.
    
    It worked just fine in previous releases (at least 4.10, 4.9.3, 4.3). But
    now, in 4.11.1 RC it doesn't.
    
    
    2018-05-30 17:36 GMT+07:00 Dag Sonstebo <Dag.Sonstebo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
    
    > Hi Ivan,
    >
    > Host tags are an absolute requirement – so if host tag matching can not be
    > met due to affinity or planner then the VMs won’t start.
    >
    > Regards,
    > Dag Sonstebo
    > Cloud Architect
    > ShapeBlue
    >
    > On 30/05/2018, 11:33, "Ivan Kudryavtsev" <kudryavtsev_ia@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
    >
    >     Sorry for spamming your e-mails, I finally have got the exact behavior:
    >
    >     If
    >       VM host tags set AND (OR) VM UerDispersingPlanner set
    >     then not able to deploy vm
    >
    >     Anti-affinity works fine (if first two are not set).
    >
    >
    >
    >     2018-05-30 17:18 GMT+07:00 Ivan Kudryavtsev <kudryavtsev_ia@xxxxxxxxx
    > >:
    >
    >     > To be more precise, I see that error only under "admin" user. Users
    > from
    >     > domains can create VMS with anti-affinity groups fine.
    >     >
    >     > 2018-05-30 16:38 GMT+07:00 Ivan Kudryavtsev <
    > kudryavtsev_ia@xxxxxxxxx>:
    >     >
    >     >> Hello, Devs. I have a fresh 4.11.1 RC with two KVM hosts deployed.
    >     >>
    >     >> First, I unable to deploy instances with UserDispersingPlanner
    > planner.
    >     >> The errors look like:
    >     >>
    >     >> 2018-05-30 16:31:35,372 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServlet]
    >     >> (qtp1856056345-27:ctx-3fb8db1f ctx-d8415fd2) (logid:dbe8f2ce)
    > ===END===
    >     >> 91.221.61.126 -- GET  command=deployVirtualMachine&r
    >     >> esponse=json&zoneid=d477bb3f-3592-4503-8f2a-da3d878dd476&tem
    >     >> plateid=369815dc-0622-4645-8ca4-c6432baebe89&hypervisor=KVM&
    >     >> serviceofferingid=eab6a6fa-ae7d-4e39-9ddf-32285cdfd20b&
    >     >> affinitygroupids=c2ca0ddf-9e87-4d7c-9e91-3f6eb56f30f4&
    >     >> securitygroupids=c1ec899c-c69b-11e7-bdcf-0242ac110004&
    >     >> displayname=aaa4&name=aaa4&_=1527672695121
    >     >> 2018-05-30 16:31:35,456 DEBUG [c.c.d.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
    >     >> (API-Job-Executor-10:ctx-b36a77ea job-156334 ctx-9c358aab)
    >     >> (logid:5ee25964) DeploymentPlanner allocation algorithm: null
    >     >> 2018-05-30 16:31:35,456 DEBUG [c.c.d.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
    >     >> (API-Job-Executor-10:ctx-b36a77ea job-156334 ctx-9c358aab)
    >     >> (logid:5ee25964) Trying to allocate a host and storage pools from
    > dc:1,
    >     >> pod:null,cluster:null, requested cpu: 9000, requested ram:
    > 12884901888
    >     >> 2018-05-30 16:31:35,456 DEBUG [c.c.d.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
    >     >> (API-Job-Executor-10:ctx-b36a77ea job-156334 ctx-9c358aab)
    >     >> (logid:5ee25964) Is ROOT volume READY (pool already allocated)?: No
    >     >> 2018-05-30 16:31:35,460 DEBUG [o.a.c.a.HostAntiAffinityProcessor]
    >     >> (API-Job-Executor-10:ctx-b36a77ea job-156334 ctx-9c358aab)
    >     >> (logid:5ee25964) Processing affinity group test for VM Id: 2149
    >     >> 2018-05-30 16:31:35,473 DEBUG [c.c.d.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
    >     >> (API-Job-Executor-10:ctx-b36a77ea job-156334 ctx-9c358aab)
    >     >> (logid:5ee25964) Deploy avoids pods: [], clusters: [], hosts: []
    >     >> 2018-05-30 16:31:35,474 DEBUG [c.c.d.FirstFitPlanner]
    >     >> (API-Job-Executor-10:ctx-b36a77ea job-156334 ctx-9c358aab)
    >     >> (logid:5ee25964) Searching all possible resources under this Zone: 1
    >     >> 2018-05-30 16:31:35,476 DEBUG [c.c.d.FirstFitPlanner]
    >     >> (API-Job-Executor-10:ctx-b36a77ea job-156334 ctx-9c358aab)
    >     >> (logid:5ee25964) Listing clusters in order of aggregate capacity,
    > that have
    >     >> (atleast one host with) enough CPU and RAM capacity under this
    > Zone: 1
    >     >> 2018-05-30 16:31:35,479 DEBUG [c.c.d.FirstFitPlanner]
    >     >> (API-Job-Executor-10:ctx-b36a77ea job-156334 ctx-9c358aab)
    >     >> (logid:5ee25964) Removing from the clusterId list these clusters
    > from avoid
    >     >> set: []
    >     >> 2018-05-30 16:31:35,486 DEBUG [c.c.d.FirstFitPlanner]
    >     >> (API-Job-Executor-10:ctx-b36a77ea job-156334 ctx-9c358aab)
    >     >> (logid:5ee25964) The clusterId list for the given offering tag: []
    >     >> 2018-05-30 16:31:35,486 DEBUG [c.c.d.FirstFitPlanner]
    >     >> (API-Job-Executor-10:ctx-b36a77ea job-156334 ctx-9c358aab)
    >     >> (logid:5ee25964) No clusters found after removing disabled clusters
    > and
    >     >> clusters in avoid list, returning.
    >     >> 2018-05-30 16:31:35,490 DEBUG [c.c.v.UserVmManagerImpl]
    >     >> (API-Job-Executor-10:ctx-b36a77ea job-156334 ctx-9c358aab)
    >     >> (logid:5ee25964) Destroying vm VM[User|i-2-2149-VM] as it failed to
    > create
    >     >> on Host with Id:null
    >     >>
    >     >> It's not in the "deployment.planners.exclude" btw.
    >     >>
    >     >> I removed from offerings that attribute:
    >     >> update service_offering_view set deployment_planner = null;
    >     >>
    >     >> and they can be deployed right now.
    >     >>
    >     >>
    >     >> Second, VMs with anti-affinity also won't deploy:
    >     >>
    >     >> The message is exactly the same by meaning.
    >     >>
    >     >>
    >     >>
    >     >> --
    >     >> With best regards, Ivan Kudryavtsev
    >     >> Bitworks Software, Ltd.
    >     >> Cell: +7-923-414-1515
    >     >> WWW: http://bitworks.software/ <http://bw-sw.com/>
    >     >>
    >     >>
    >     >
    >     >
    >     > --
    >     > With best regards, Ivan Kudryavtsev
    >     > Bitworks Software, Ltd.
    >     > Cell: +7-923-414-1515
    >     > WWW: http://bitworks.software/ <http://bw-sw.com/>
    >     >
    >     >
    >
    >
    >     --
    >     With best regards, Ivan Kudryavtsev
    >     Bitworks Software, Ltd.
    >     Cell: +7-923-414-1515
    >     WWW: http://bitworks.software/ <http://bw-sw.com/>
    >
    >
    >
    > Dag.Sonstebo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
    > www.shapeblue.com
    > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
    > @shapeblue
    >
    >
    >
    >
    
    
    -- 
    With best regards, Ivan Kudryavtsev
    Bitworks Software, Ltd.
    Cell: +7-923-414-1515
    WWW: http://bitworks.software/ <http://bw-sw.com/>
    


Dag.Sonstebo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue