][Thread Next][Date Index
Re: TTL of paxos table
It's just that compaction hasn't occured. TTL works even though GCGS is 0.
There's been multiple discussions around this in the past, but we haven't
come to a consensus yet though. Some proposals to change compaction
strategy, some want to make it customisable. Treating paxos as sub-tables
has also come up and the improvements listed in CASSANDRA-13548.
TBH we should probably do 13548 and see where that gets us.
On 30 August 2018 at 13:14, Yuji Ito <yuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I wonder why records on the system.paxos table aren't removed, though all
> records are updated with TTL (at least 3 hours).
> That's because gc_grace_seconds of system.paxos table is always 0 and users
> can't change that value of System keyspace!
> Why is the TTL of paxos record invalidated?
> Or, I'm misunderstanding?
> Related to: