[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [NOTICE] Mandatory relocation of Apache git repositories on

Regarding the “site” branch. After a release, it should always point to the same as “master”. (It may diverge later, if there are changes made to the web site in master branch that we do not wish to immediately publish.) Sorry I forgot to push to site.

Regarding gitbox. How should I set up my environment? I previously had origin as follows:

$ git remote -v |grep origin
origin (fetch)
origin (push)

Now I point it to GitHub, as follows:

$ git remote set-url origin git@xxxxxxxxxx:apache/calcite.git

but I am not able to push.


> On Dec 25, 2018, at 7:56 PM, Andrei Sereda <andrei@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Just in case.
> I made some changes to elastic adapter documentation (but didn't deploy
> them)  :
> 1) c3e076c0
> <>
> 2) af739cbe
> <>
> My changes should be in both master and site branches.
> On Tue, Dec 25, 2018 at 9:48 PM Francis Chuang <francischuang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>> When I deployed the changes to update the PMC Chair, I deployed the
>> master branch. I checked out the site branch, but it appeared to be
>> missing the site commits for Calcite 1.18 release and since I don't
>> commit to Calcite often, I didn't want to cherry-pick the commits into
>> the site branch and potentially break things.
>> I think deploying the master branch should be safe for now, because 1.18
>> was just released and there hasn't been any changes to the site for 1.19
>> yet.
>> On 26/12/2018 1:02 pm, Michael Mior wrote:
>>> I've made commits to master to update the site but somehow my site branch
>>> seems to be out of sync with what's deployed. If someone who has deployed
>>> the site recently has a chance to check it out that would be great.
>>> --
>>> Michael Mior
>>> mmior@xxxxxxxxxx
>>> Le mar. 25 déc. 2018 à 16:20, Michael Mior <michael.mior@xxxxxxxxx> a
>>> écrit :
>>>> The migration is already done to my surprise. I'll try to update the
>> site
>>>> and send out an announcement to committers later today.
>>>> On Tue, Dec 25, 2018, 16:15 Francis Chuang <francischuang@xxxxxxxxxx
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Thanks for sorting this out, Michael! Can't wait to try it!
>>>>> On 26/12/2018 2:13 am, Michael Mior wrote:
>>>>>> Since there have been no objections and the release is now complete,
>>>>> I've
>>>>>> requested the migration.
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Michael Mior
>>>>>> mmior@xxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> Le ven. 7 déc. 2018 à 11:54, Daniel Gruno <humbedooh@xxxxxxxxxx> a
>>>>> écrit :
>>>>>>> Hello Apache projects,
>>>>>>> I am writing to you because you may have git repositories on the
>>>>>>> git-wip-us server, which is slated to be decommissioned in the coming
>>>>>>> months. All repositories will be moved to the new gitbox service
>> which
>>>>>>> includes direct write access on github as well as the standard ASF
>>>>>>> commit access via
>>>>>>> ## Why this move? ##
>>>>>>> The move comes as a result of retiring the git-wip service, as the
>>>>>>> hardware it runs on is longing for retirement. In lieu of this, we
>>>>>>> have decided to consolidate the two services (git-wip and gitbox), to
>>>>>>> ease the management of our repository systems and future-proof the
>>>>>>> underlying hardware. The move is fully automated, and ideally,
>> nothing
>>>>>>> will change in your workflow other than added features and access to
>>>>>>> GitHub.
>>>>>>> ## Timeframe for relocation ##
>>>>>>> Initially, we are asking that projects voluntarily request to move
>>>>>>> their repositories to gitbox, hence this email. The voluntary
>>>>>>> timeframe is between now and January 9th 2019, during which projects
>>>>>>> are free to either move over to gitbox or stay put on git-wip. After
>>>>>>> this phase, we will be requiring the remaining projects to move
>> within
>>>>>>> one month, after which we will move the remaining projects over.
>>>>>>> To have your project moved in this initial phase, you will need:
>>>>>>> - Consensus in the project (documented via the mailing list)
>>>>>>> - File a JIRA ticket with INFRA to voluntarily move your project
>> repos
>>>>>>>     over to gitbox (as stated, this is highly automated and will
>> take
>>>>>>>     between a minute and an hour, depending on the size and number
>> of
>>>>>>>     your repositories)
>>>>>>> To sum up the preliminary timeline;
>>>>>>> - December 9th 2018 -> January 9th 2019: Voluntary (coordinated)
>>>>>>>     relocation
>>>>>>> - January 9th -> February 6th: Mandated (coordinated) relocation
>>>>>>> - February 7th: All remaining repositories are mass migrated.
>>>>>>> This timeline may change to accommodate various scenarios.
>>>>>>> ## Using GitHub with ASF repositories ##
>>>>>>> When your project has moved, you are free to use either the ASF
>>>>>>> repository system ( OR GitHub for your development
>>>>>>> and code pushes. To be able to use GitHub, please follow the primer
>>>>>>> at:
>>>>>>> We appreciate your understanding of this issue, and hope that your
>>>>>>> project can coordinate voluntarily moving your repositories in a
>>>>>>> timely manner.
>>>>>>> All settings, such as commit mail targets, issue linking, PR
>>>>>>> notification schemes etc will automatically be migrated to gitbox as
>>>>>>> well.
>>>>>>> With regards, Daniel on behalf of ASF Infra.
>>>>>>> PS:For inquiries, please reply to users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, not your
>>>>>>> project's dev list :-).