git.net

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.18


Thanks Julian! Unfortunately with family visiting this weekend, my
bandwidth is currently fairly low but I'll try to churn through some PRs
early this coming week.

On Fri, Nov 30, 2018, 23:00 Julian Hyde <jhyde@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> It looks as if Avatica will be released soon, and as that was our main
> dependency for Calcite 1.18, we can move ahead with the release.
>
> I volunteer to be release manager for Calcite 1.18, and propose that we
> make an RC on Monday.
>
> There are a lot of PRs (107 open currently)[1]. I can’t get through them
> all myself, so I will need help reviewing & merging them. (If you are
> committer, look in the JIRA case to see whether someone has begun reviewing
> the PR. I am reviewing several right now.)
>
> Even with help, we are not going to get to all PRs. That will have to be
> OK; it has been too long since we had a release, and we just don’t have
> enough active committers to deal with the number of incoming contributions.
>
> Julian
>
> [1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pulls
>
>
> > On Nov 6, 2018, at 4:24 AM, Michael Mior <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Not strictly necessary I believe, but I know there's a desire to upgrade
> > Jetty in Calcite that can't happen until the Avatica release, so it would
> > be nice to see that happen first.
> >
> >
> >
> > Le lun. 5 nov. 2018 à 16:31, Francis Chuang <francischuang@xxxxxxxxxx> a
> > écrit :
> >
> >> I think we should consider releasing new versions of Calcite and Avatica
> >> soon, especially with the Thanksgiving holiday in North America and
> >> Christmas + New Year later in December/January coming up.
> >>
> >> Am I correct to assume that we need to release Avatica 1.13.0 before
> >> Calcite 1.18.0?
> >>
> >> If so, I am able to be release manager for Avatica if no one else is
> >> interested.
> >>
> >> On 21/10/2018 6:13 PM, Michael Mior wrote:
> >>> Thanks for continuing to push releases forward! Unfortunately I won't
> be
> >>> able to volunteer to be release manager this time around, but I'll try
> to
> >>> set aside some time to go through some PRs.
> >>>
> >>> On Sat, Oct 20, 2018, 02:21 Julian Hyde <jhyde@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> OK, it's now exactly 3 months since 1.17. I think it's time. I think
> >>>> we should aim for a first RC a week from today (Friday 26th October).
> >>>>
> >>>> Can we have a volunteer to be release manager?
> >>>>
> >>>> Also, there are lots of PRs to review and merge. Please help out with
> >>>> that task, committers.
> >>>>
> >>>> Julian
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 11:00 AM Julian Hyde <jhyde@xxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> >>>>> We’ll be sure to get PRs into the release. If you like, you can make
> >> the
> >>>> JIRA case depend on those 3 cases - that will remind us.
> >>>>> (Other contributors: You can do that also, but only if you have a PR
> >>>> that you believe is ready to submit.)
> >>>>>> On Sep 20, 2018, at 8:18 AM, Andrew Pilloud
> >>>> <apilloud@xxxxxxxxxx.INVALID> wrote:
> >>>>>> Beam has a few JIRAs we'd like to see make the next release (which
> >> will
> >>>>>> enable us to replace 11k lines of code with calls to Calcite). They
> >> all
> >>>>>> have open PRs.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2404 Accessing
> >>>>>> structured-types is not implemented by the runtime
> >>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2529 linq4j should
> >>>> promote
> >>>>>> integer to floating point when generating function calls
> >>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2571 TRIM does not
> >>>> match
> >>>>>> the behavior of most SQL implementations
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Andrew
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 6:38 PM Kevin Risden <krisden@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>> 9/25 should be the GA release of JDK 11 according to [1]. Would be
> >>>> good to
> >>>>>>> ensure that the next release is compatible with it. We should be in
> >>>> good
> >>>>>>> shape but would be a good release note too.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> 1. http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk/11/
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Kevin Risden
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 19, 2018, 20:56 Francis Chuang <
> francischuang@xxxxxxxxxx
> >>>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> For avatica, there are currently 6 open PRs. A few of them appear
> to
> >>>> be
> >>>>>>>> blocked due to incompatibilities with JDK or something else.
> Perhaps
> >>>> the
> >>>>>>>> situation has now changed and we can get those in for 1.13.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 20/09/2018 9:26 AM, Julian Hyde wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> I have logged
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2576 <
> >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2576> Release
> Avatica
> >>>> 1.13
> >>>>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2575 <
> >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2575> Release
> Calcite
> >>>>>>> 1.18.0
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Sep 19, 2018, at 4:19 PM, Julian Hyde <jhyde@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Calcite 1.17 was released on 20th July (2 months ago) and since
> >>>> then
> >>>>>>>> there have been almost 100 commits.
> >>>>>>>>>> Does anyone have constraints on when 1.18 should be released?
> (My
> >>>>>>>> opinion: we should aim for 3 months after 1.17, and therefore we
> >> will
> >>>>>>> need
> >>>>>>>> an RC before 10th October.)
> >>>>>>>>>> Does anyone have any JIRA cases that they would like to get into
> >>>> 1.18
> >>>>>>>> but they have not yet finished?
> >>>>>>>>>> Who would like to be release manager?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Do we need a new Avatica release before we make this Calcite
> >>>> release?
> >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2467 <
> >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2467> describes one
> >>>> reason
> >>>>>>>> to do so: jetty versions. Also, it would be nice if both projects
> >>>> used
> >>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>> new parent POM (see
> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2486 <
> >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2486>) but it’s not
> >>>>>>>> essential.
> >>>>>>>>>> Julian
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>
> >>
>
>