git.net

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Mongo, Elasticsearch or Solr adapters


The Apache Solr adapter isn't part of Apache Calcite proper. I don't know
if it would be easy to test standalone. I'd be curious to hear about any
Solr related issues.

One related though is that Elasticsearch 6.3.0 is supposed to have some SQL
support out of the box with xpack as well. Right now there are only
Elasticsearch 2.x and 5.x adapters. I was looking into building an
Elasticsearch 6.x adapter for Calcite just haven't had time.

Kevin Risden

On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 2:22 PM, Michael Mior <mmior@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I believe the MongoDB and Elasticsearch adapters should be considered
> relatively stable. The Elasticsearch adapter has seen quite a bit of
> development lately thanks to Christian Beikov.
>
> --
> Michael Mior
> mmior@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> Le lun. 14 mai 2018 à 21:10, Edmon Begoli <ebegoli@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
>
> > Colleagues,
> >
> > I am getting ready to engage in the next range of research with Calcite
> and
> > textually accessible resources through Calcite.
> >
> > I am considering Mongo, Elasticsearch and Solr.
> >
> > Can anyone here tell me more about the maturity and stability of the
> Mongo,
> > Elasticsearch, and Solr adapters?
> >
> > This will help us determine if we should embark on this research. We do
> not
> > have time to test too many scenarios to determine by trial-and-error if
> > these adapters are mature enough.
> > (we could, though, at some later date)
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Edmon
> >
>