Re: Calcite - JDK 8 and Use of Guava
> Can you hold off making code changes for a few days, until I can commit
> the branch?
Definitely can hold off wasn't immediately going to start on this other
than initial research. Will add details to CALCITE-2259
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 1:07 AM, Enrico Olivelli <eolivelli@xxxxxxxxx>
> Il gio 26 apr 2018, 06:55 Julian Hyde <jhyde@xxxxxxxxxx> ha scritto:
> > In general I would agree that we should replace Guava with JDK features
> > the JDK has them.
> > However, we must preserve compatibility, so if an API uses Guava Function
> > or Predicate or Supplier or ImmutableList then we should probably keep it
> > that way. Or let’s discuss it.
> It would be a very good improvement to drop Guava and in general third
> party classes from public API.
> For the limited use of Calcite I am doing I am not aware of such critical
> Another good step is to shade and relocate Guava so that downstream
> projects do not have conflicts.
> My 2 cents
> > Converting Preconditions.checkNotNull to Objects.requireNonNull seems
> > pretty safe.
> > I’ve started work on 2259 in a branch that is not yet committed. (Mainly
> > converting anonymous classes to lambdas at this point.) Can you hold off
> > making code changes for a few days, until I can commit the branch? In
> > CALCITE-2259, make a list of things that we should do, and we can apply
> > to the whole code base. Many lines of code will change, and that
> > the chances of merge conflicts, so it’s important that we don’t make any
> > changes in functionality in that commit.
> > Julian
> > > On Apr 25, 2018, at 9:15 PM, Kevin Risden <krisden@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > There is a discussion in SOLR-11763 about Guava and limiting its use by
> > > replacing with native JDK 8 alternatives. Since Calcite 0.16.0 is now
> > > minimum JDK 8 this looks to be viable. CALCITE-2259 identifies a few
> > other
> > > JDK 8 nice to haves.
> > >
> > > One example looks to be:
> > > * Preconditions.checkNotNull(obj); // Guava
> > > * Objects.requireNonNull(obj); // JDK 8
> > >
> > > Are there any concerns with looking into this? Are there any known
> > features
> > > of Guava that are necessary? I know some adapters might require Guava.
> > >
> > > I am just starting to look at this and figured I'd ask before diving in
> > > head first. I would start with core and then work out to other modules.
> > >
> > >  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11763
> > >  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2259
> > >
> > > Kevin Risden
> > --
> -- Enrico Olivelli