On Apr 23, 2018, at 9:20 PM, Julian Hyde <jhyde@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Downloaded, checked checksums (could not check signatures due to gpg
problems on my machine), checked headers, LICENSE, NOTICE, README.md.
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 7:04 PM, Josh Elser <elserj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
* xsums+sigs OK
* KEYS updated and signing key is published
* No binary files in src release
* License headers on relevant files
* LICENSE is OK
* NOTICE is OK
Good work, Francis!
On 4/22/18 8:05 PM, Francis Chuang wrote:
I have created a release for Apache Calcite Avatica Go 3.0.0, release
The release notes are available here:
The commit to be voted on:
The hash is 273c53f62206c90e6a4fbb05f4ac82b7f62cb9a7
The artifacts to be voted on are located here:
The hashes of the artifacts are as follows:
src.tar.gz.md5 00 D1 D0 92 07 C0 60 86 A2 C5 65 E3 B8 60 13 12
src.tar.gz.sha256 6D303B02 442A3999 88DE9234 F0DF733D 49F69B95 35B0C5BC
Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
Instructions for running the test suite is located here:
Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Calcite Avatica Go 3.0.0.
The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of
at least three +1 PMC votes are cast.
[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Calcite Avatica Go 3.0.0
[ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
Here is my vote: