git.net

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [VOTE] Apache BookKeeper Release 4.6.2, release candidate #0


-1

I am cancelling this vote due to a problem in a signature file

As Jia has pointed you bookkeeper-server-4.6.2-bin.tar.gz.asc
<https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/bookkeeper/bookkeeper/bookkeeper-4.6.2-rc0/bookkeeper-server-4.6.2-bin.tar.gz.asc>
does not contain a "detached signature" but the whole file + the signature.

I will send a new RC package very soon

Thank you
Enrico


2018-04-03 9:17 GMT+02:00 Sijie Guo <guosijie@xxxxxxxxx>:

> On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 12:07 AM, Enrico Olivelli <eolivelli@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> > 2018-04-03 4:13 GMT+02:00 Jia Zhai <zhaijia03@xxxxxxxxx>:
> >
> > > Hi Enrico,
> > > Thanks for the work. Seems this asc file has some error:
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/bookkeeper/
> > > bookkeeper/bookkeeper-4.6.2-rc0/bookkeeper-server-4.6.2-bin.tar.gz.asc
> > >
> > >
> >
> > That was was not generated automatically. I used the wrong command and
> > actually now it contains the whole file + the signature.
> >
> > I don't know which is the best procedure.
> >
> > Should I roll a new RC or simply update the .asc file ?
>
>
> You need to cancel this vote. but you don't need to redo the whole process.
>
> - cancel this vote.
> - bump rc0 to rc1
> - upload to bookkeeper-rc1 with new packages
> - call a new vote.
>
>
> >
>
>
> > Enrico
> >
> >
> > > Thanks.
> > > -Jia
> > >
> > > On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 11:23 PM, Enrico Olivelli <eolivelli@xxxxxxxxx
> >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 (binding)
> > > > - run tests (on jdk8, linux Fedora 26)
> > > > - run bookie (single machine cluster) on jdk10+fedora 26 and run
> simple
> > > > tests from bookkeeper shell
> > > > - tested on staging environments with jdk9+CentOS7 (machines which
> > > reported
> > > > request/response corruptions with 4.6.1)
> > > >
> > > > Enrico
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2018-03-28 10:35 GMT+02:00 Enrico Olivelli <eolivelli@xxxxxxxxx>:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi everyone,
> > > > > Please review and vote on the release candidate #0 for the version
> > > 4.6.2,
> > > > > as follows:
> > > > > [ ] +1, Approve the release
> > > > > [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific
> comments)
> > > > >
> > > > > The complete staging area is available for your review, which
> > includes:
> > > > > * Release notes [1]
> > > > > * The official Apache source and binary distributions to be
> deployed
> > to
> > > > > dist.apache.org [2]
> > > > > * All artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [3]
> > > > > * Source code tag "release-4.6.2" [4] with git sha
> > > > > 70c613f1700d4c19e36c10b5b51e841b138569fb
> > > > >
> > > > > BookKeeper's KEYS file contains PGP keys we used to sign this
> > release:
> > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/bookkeeper/KEYS
> > > > >
> > > > > Please download these packages and review this release candidate:
> > > > >
> > > > > - Review release notes
> > > > > - Download the source package (verify md5, shasum, and asc) and
> > follow
> > > > the
> > > > > instructions to build and run the bookkeeper service.
> > > > > - Download the binary package (verify md5, shasum, and asc) and
> > follow
> > > > the
> > > > > instructions to run the bookkeeper service.
> > > > > - Review maven repo, release tag, licenses, and any other things
> you
> > > > think
> > > > > it is important to a release.
> > > > >
> > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by
> > majority
> > > > > approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Enrico Olivelli
> > > > >
> > > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/1297/
> > > > > [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/bookkeeper/
> > > > > bookkeeper/bookkeeper-4.6.2-rc0/
> > > > > [3] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> > > > > orgapachebookkeeper-1025/
> > > > > [4] https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/commits/release-4.6.2
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>