Re: Mass changes to various projects under Ant umbrella - should we be doing it?
On 2018-04-07, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> I don't mean to appear authoritative but I feel that these mass,
> never-ending changes to various projects under the Ant umbrella,
> related to formatting, coding style, whitespaces, syntax changes and
> such aren't really worth it.
We've done some systematic changes in the past, usually when a certain
pattern has lead to bugs and we wanted to ensure the pattern was
eliminated systematically. There are some precendents around
try-with-resources or the introduction of generics that were similar to
Gintas' series of commits, but there've only been a few.
We did have one big "cleanup" commit which has been the one that brought
us the regressions in 1.10.2 and I deeply regret not taking the time
reviewing the change back then.
> Especially when a lot of those changes are merely, IMO, personal
> preferences, to code that has been around for a long time now.
> It's extremely hard to do any kind of review for such changes and IMO
> they really don't add any value.
Some of them certainly are personal preferences. I tend to agree that
many of the latest changes are not really improving the code base.
I'm about twenty commits behind on reviewing the changes.
> I haven't been long around in the project, to have any kind of
> authority on this matter, but having been involved in some other open
> source projects, changes like these aren't really good nor are
> typically considered required or accepted.
You've got as much authority as anybody else of us to state you don't
like the changes or as Gintas has stating they make to code base
Honestly, I would prefer to not make this type of change at the scale
they have happened. Mostly because I feel I'm spending a lot of time
reviewing changes that transform working code into equivalent working
code. Not reviewig the changes is not an option.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx