git.net

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 1.10.1 Release?


Oh that’s a great environment to start digging. Thanks. I’ll have a look.

B.

Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad

> Op 30 okt. 2018 om 18:25 heeft Ash Berlin-Taylor <ash@xxxxxxxxxx> het volgende geschreven:
> 
> This line in airflow.jobs (line 874 in my checkout) is causing the loop:
> 
>            last_run = dag.get_last_dagrun(session=session)
>            if last_run and next_run_date:
>                while next_run_date <= last_run.execution_date:
>                    next_run_date = dag.following_schedule(next_run_date)
> 
> 
> 
>> On 30 Oct 2018, at 17:20, Ash Berlin-Taylor <ash@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi, kaczors on gitter has produced a minmal reproduction case: https://github.com/kaczors/airflow_1_10_tz_bug
>> 
>> Rough repro steps: In a VM, with time syncing disabled, and configured with system timezone of Europe/Zurich (or any other CEST one) run 
>> 
>> - `date 10280250.00`
>> - initdb, start scheduler, webserver, enable dag etc.
>> - `date 10280259.00`
>> - wait 5-10 mins for scheduler to catch up
>> - After the on-the-hour task run the scheduler will spin up another process to parse the dag... and it never returns.
>> 
>> I've only just managed to reproduce it, so haven't dug in to why yet. A quick hacky debug print shows something is stuck in an infinite loop.
>> 
>> -ash
>> 
>>> On 29 Oct 2018, at 17:59, Bolke de Bruin <bdbruin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Can this be confirmed? Then I can have a look at it. Preferably with dag definition code.
>>> 
>>> On the licensing requirements:
>>> 
>>> 1. Indeed licensing header for markdown documents. It was suggested to use html comments. I’m not sure how that renders with others like PDF though.
>>> 2. The licensing notifications need to be tied to a specific version as licenses might change with versions.
>>> 
>>> Cheers
>>> Bolke
>>> 
>>> Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad
>>> 
>>>> Op 29 okt. 2018 om 12:39 heeft Ash Berlin-Taylor <ash@xxxxxxxxxx> het volgende geschreven:
>>>> 
>>>> I was going to make a start on the release, but two people have reported that there might be an issue around non-UTC dags and the scheduler changing over from Summer time.
>>>> 
>>>>> 08:45 Emmanuel> Hi there, we are currently experiencing a very strange issue : we have hourly DAGs with a start_date in a local timezone (not UTC) and since (Sunday) the last winter time change they don’t run anymore. Any idea ?
>>>>> 09:41 <Emmanuel> it impacted all our DAG that had a run at 3am (Europe/Paris), the exact time of winter time change :(
>>>> 
>>>> I am going to take a look at this today and see if I can get to the bottom of it.
>>>> 
>>>> Bolke: are there any outstanding tasks/issues that you know of that might slow down the vote for a 1.10.1? (i.e. did we sort of out all the licensing issues that were asked of us? I thought I read something about license declarations in markdown files?)
>>>> 
>>>> -ash
>>>> 
>>>>> On 28 Oct 2018, at 14:46, Bolke de Bruin <bdbruin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> I agree with that, but I would favor time based releases instead. We are again at the point that a release takes so much time that the gap is getting really big again. @ash why not start releasing now and move the remainder to 1.10.2? I dont think there are real blockers (although we might find them).
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 28 Oct 2018, at 15:35, airflowuser <airflowuser@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.INVALID> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I was really hoping that https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/pull/4069 will be merged into 1.10.1
>>>>>> Deleting dags was a highly requested feature for 1.10 - this can fix the problem with it.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
>>>>>>>> On Friday, October 26, 2018 6:12 PM, Bolke de Bruin <bdbruin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hey Ash,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I was wondering if you are picking up the 1.10.1 release? Master is speeding ahead and you were tracking fixes for 1.10.1 right?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> B.
>>>> 
>> 
>