[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [DISCUSS] Commits report

Ah, I thought you meant the reports themselves.

I dont see an issue with it being where it is, most of the tools we
use come from other places, but it might be simple to use if it was in
the website repo or dist dev area, alongside where the output is being

On 22 May 2018 at 14:47, Clebert Suconic <clebert.suconic@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> What I meant was the project itself..
> It's currently living on my github fork. I don't have an issue with it
> living on my page only.. I was just checking if anyone want a better
> home for it.
> I will add a step (tomorrow) on how to generate the report.
> On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 6:06 AM, Robbie Gemmell
> <robbie.gemmell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> If its being linked to later I'd just put it in a subdir of the
>> website. I'd do that even before/during the vote so it isnt
>> complicating the final release steps as it did this time.
>> Alternatively, or if it isnt being linked to later, at least moving it
>> to a different subdir of the dist dev area than the release files
>> would give the same effect.
>> On 21 May 2018 at 19:01, Clebert Suconic <clebert.suconic@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> If we update the Release guide to include the commit report. Is there
>>> any git repo we could include it, as a sub project of ActiveMQ?
>>> The report could actually work on both ActiveMQ and Artemis codebases.
>>> On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 8:35 AM, Clebert Suconic
>>> <clebert.suconic@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> I meant the announcement email.  And the report staying along with the
>>>> release notes as you said.  Not on the mirrors no.
>>>> On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 7:29 AM Robbie Gemmell <robbie.gemmell@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> I think the report is nice, consolidating the details as it does. Its
>>>>> worth saying much of it is essentially available live via the JIRA
>>>>> release notes though given appropriate JIRA/commit handling.
>>>>> When you mention "the release report", do you mean the announcement
>>>>> email? If so I dont think including it would be an issue, though I
>>>>> probably wouldnt as the existing JIRA based release notes output (e.g
>>>>> seems
>>>>> more suited for typical user needs to me than this, which feels like
>>>>> it would be more useful to e.g the community before/during the vote.
>>>>> I dont think it should be put on the mirrors however, which it
>>>>> currently would be if left in the location it is now and the release
>>>>> is published in the prior manner. Putting it on the website seems more
>>>>> appropriate. If it is to be put on the mirrors however its essentially
>>>>> 'released' and so likely needs some licensing information added as the
>>>>> HTML has none (though it is generated, so that may be ok) and the js
>>>>> files distributed alongside dont detail any other than URLs which isnt
>>>>> sufficient. The css at least mentions the names along with its URLs,
>>>>> but thats perhaps not sufficient either.
>>>>> Robbie
>>>>> On 17 May 2018 at 03:52, Clebert Suconic <clebert.suconic@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> > Before someone asks on the VOTE Thread.. I wanted to point out that I
>>>>> > made a small project to parse git commit and generate a report.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > I have ran the report on top of artemis and I'm adding a commit report
>>>>> > here that can be useful at least on the voter's thread:
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > I think it would be useful to have this one on top of the release
>>>>> > report as well. If nobody opposes I would like to add it to the next
>>>>> > release report.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > The report generator current lives on my github page but it could be
>>>>> > moved somewhere else if someone bothers about being on my github fork:
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > --
>>>>> > Clebert Suconic
>>>> --
>>>> Clebert Suconic
>>> --
>>> Clebert Suconic
> --
> Clebert Suconic